Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of health economics and outcomes research

Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor.

  1. 1CVS Healthspire™ Life Sciences Solution, Woonsocket, Rhode Island, USA.
  2. 2Cala Health, Inc., San Mateo, California, USA.

Abstract

Background

TAPS® therapy (Cala Health) delivers transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation through a noninvasive, wrist-worn neuromodulation device for the treatment of hand tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). Although previous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness and safety, real-world evidence regarding its long-term clinical outcomes and economic impact remains limited.Objectives

To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness and the healthcare resource utilization and cost impact of TAPS in patients with ET treated in real-world settings.Methods

Patients who completed a 1-month randomized pragmatic phase comparing TAPS with standard of care entered 12 months of open-label home use. Clinical outcomes were assessed via device-based motion sensors and the Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) upper-limb scale at baseline and every 3 months. Healthcare resource utilization and costs over the 12-month TAPS treatment period were compared with those during the 12 months before TAPS initiation and with a propensity-score-matched external control arm (ECA) derived from a large US commercial and Medicare Advantage claims database.Results

Among 225 patients who used TAPS therapy for 12 months, daily functioning improved, with the mean BF-ADL score decreasing from 17.2 to 15.8 (P < .003). Device-measured tremor power decreased by more than 50% (P < .001). No serious device-related adverse events were reported. In the ECA analysis, 153 TAPS-treated patients were matched to 306 ECA patients. Compared with baseline, TAPS-treated patients experienced significant reductions in ET-related healthcare costs ($440 decrease; P < .0001), ET-related medication use (15% fewer patients; P < .01), and ambulatory and office visits (~0.3 fewer each; P < .05). These reductions were significantly greater than those observed in the ECA (all P < .05).Discussion

This is the largest and longest prospective ET study to jointly assess tremor severity, daily function, and healthcare economic outcomes. The sustained clinical benefits observed with TAPS therapy, together with reductions in ET-related healthcare utilization and costs, support TAPS as a noninvasive treatment option for adults with ET.Conclusions

Over 12 months of real-world use, TAPS reduced tremor severity, improved daily functioning, and lowered ET-related healthcare resource utilization and costs.

Related

  1. Distinguishing clinical efficacy from vagal target engagement in perioperative transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation.
    Yi Zhang
    Annals of medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  2. Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on postoperative liver injury in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy: a phase II clinical randomized trial
    Yuanyuan Wang, Mingshu Tao, Zhengxiu Sun +14
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  3. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for functional recovery in individuals with hereditary spastic paraplegia: Protocol for a pilot clinical trial
    Vivek K. Pandey, Holly M. Elliott, Amara G. Sharp +12
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnzymology & metabolismProteomics & metabolomicsPLOS
  4. Mindfulness meditation plus transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for alcohol use disorder: a randomized clinical trial
    Jiayi Lin, Fei Cheng, Yanping Li +12
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  5. Efficacy and Mechanism of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Poststroke Dysphagia: Protocol for a Randomized, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Luming Gao, Jin Li, Miao Xie +8
    JMIR research protocolsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{dai2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor.}},
  author = {Dingwei Dai and Chiahao Lu and Kathryn H Rosenbluth and Joaquim Fernandes},
  journal = {Journal of health economics and outcomes research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.36469/001c.170793},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927135},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation for Essential Tremor.
AU  - Dingwei Dai
AU  - Chiahao Lu
AU  - Kathryn H Rosenbluth
AU  - Joaquim Fernandes
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Journal of health economics and outcomes research
DO  - 10.36469/001c.170793
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927135
AB  - Background  TAPS® therapy (Cala Health) delivers transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation through a noninvasive, wrist-worn neuromodulation device for the treatment of hand tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). Although previous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness and safety, real-world evidence regarding its long-term clinical outcomes and economic impact remains limited.Objectives  To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness and the healthcare resource utilization and cost impact of TAPS in patients with ET treated in real-world settings.Methods  Patients who completed a 1-month randomized pragmatic phase comparing TAPS with standard of care entered 12 months of open-label home use. Clinical outcomes were assessed via device-based motion sensors and the Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) upper-limb scale at baseline and every 3 months. Healthcare resource utilization and costs over the 12-month TAPS treatment period were compared with those during the 12 months before TAPS initiation and with a propensity-score-matched external control arm (ECA) derived from a large US commercial and Medicare Advantage claims database.Results  Among 225 patients who used TAPS therapy for 12 months, daily functioning improved, with the mean BF-ADL score decreasing from 17.2 to 15.8 (P < .003). Device-measured tremor power decreased by more than 50% (P < .001). No serious device-related adverse events were reported. In the ECA analysis, 153 TAPS-treated patients were matched to 306 ECA patients. Compared with baseline, TAPS-treated patients experienced significant reductions in ET-related healthcare costs ($440 decrease; P < .0001), ET-related medication use (15% fewer patients; P < .01), and ambulatory and office visits (~0.3 fewer each; P < .05). These reductions were significantly greater than those observed in the ECA (all P < .05).Discussion  This is the largest and longest prospective ET study to jointly assess tremor severity, daily function, and healthcare economic outcomes. The sustained clinical benefits observed with TAPS therapy, together with reductions in ET-related healthcare utilization and costs, support TAPS as a noninvasive treatment option for adults with ET.Conclusions  Over 12 months of real-world use, TAPS reduced tremor severity, improved daily functioning, and lowered ET-related healthcare resource utilization and costs.
SN  - 2326-697X
SN  - 2327-2236
ER  -