Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Uncertainty-Aware End-to-End AI Weather Forecasting: Disentangling Observation and Model Contributions

Abstract

End-to-end weather forecasting systems produce skillful global gridded and station forecasts directly from raw Earth observations, replacing the numerical weather prediction pipeline, including data assimilation, at a fraction of its cost. These systems are deterministic and issue no uncertainty. Here we render the Aardvark Weather model probabilistic by attaching one stochastic mechanism to each component: learned, input-dependent noise at the observation encoder, capturing aleatoric uncertainty inherited from the observing system, and Monte Carlo dropout in the processor, capturing epistemic uncertainty in the learned dynamics. The resulting nested ensemble attributes forecast spread to the two sources through a law-of-total-variance decomposition, cross-checked by withholding observation streams. Probabilistic finetuning significantly improves the mean forecast, by 4.2% on average across variables and lead times. The ensemble is calibrated against ERA5 through the medium range (spread-skill ratio 0.98), keeps station RMSE within 2.4% of the deterministic model while beating it in CRPS at every lead time, and trails the operational ECMWF ensemble. The encoder branch behaves as observation-driven uncertainty. Component-attributed uncertainty makes end-to-end forecasts more transparent, a step toward observation-driven digital twins of the atmosphere.

Related

  1. Rigorous uncertainty quantification of probabilistic AI weather forecasts with conformal prediction
    Anna Asch, Raphael Rossellini, Pedram Hassanzadeh +1
    arXiv (Cornell University)PreprintLicence not statedFull text6 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyOpenAlex
  2. SDECast: Probabilistic Weather Forecasting in Continuous Time with Neural SDEs
    Maria Marchenko, Martin Andrae, Fredrik Lindsten +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyStatisticsarXiv
  3. Swift: an autoregressive consistency model for efficient weather forecasting
    Jonathan G. Stock, Troy Arcomano, Veerabhadra Rao Kotamarthi
    Machine Learning EarthPeer-reviewedCC BY15 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyOpenAlex
  4. Butterfly Effect Confirmed in Global AI Weather Models: Evidence from Tropical Cyclone Forecasting
    Jeremy Cheuk-Hin Leung, Daosheng Xu, Weiye Yu +9
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  5. Weather forecasting in a changing climate: the rise of AI and Machine learning?
    Florence Rabier, Andrew Brown, Matthew Chantry +1
    Journal of the European Meteorological Society.Peer-reviewedCC BY7 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{almeida2026uncertaintyaware,
  title = {{Uncertainty-Aware End-to-End AI Weather Forecasting: Disentangling Observation and Model Contributions}},
  author = {Rodrigo Almeida and Noelia Otero and Jost Arndt and Simon Baur and Wojciech Samek and Jackie Ma},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.30795},
  eprint = {2608.30795},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30795},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Uncertainty-Aware End-to-End AI Weather Forecasting: Disentangling Observation and Model Contributions
AU  - Rodrigo Almeida
AU  - Noelia Otero
AU  - Jost Arndt
AU  - Simon Baur
AU  - Wojciech Samek
AU  - Jackie Ma
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.30795
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30795
AB  - End-to-end weather forecasting systems produce skillful global gridded and station forecasts directly from raw Earth observations, replacing the numerical weather prediction pipeline, including data assimilation, at a fraction of its cost. These systems are deterministic and issue no uncertainty. Here we render the Aardvark Weather model probabilistic by attaching one stochastic mechanism to each component: learned, input-dependent noise at the observation encoder, capturing aleatoric uncertainty inherited from the observing system, and Monte Carlo dropout in the processor, capturing epistemic uncertainty in the learned dynamics. The resulting nested ensemble attributes forecast spread to the two sources through a law-of-total-variance decomposition, cross-checked by withholding observation streams. Probabilistic finetuning significantly improves the mean forecast, by 4.2% on average across variables and lead times. The ensemble is calibrated against ERA5 through the medium range (spread-skill ratio 0.98), keeps station RMSE within 2.4% of the deterministic model while beating it in CRPS at every lead time, and trails the operational ECMWF ensemble. The encoder branch behaves as observation-driven uncertainty. Component-attributed uncertainty makes end-to-end forecasts more transparent, a step toward observation-driven digital twins of the atmosphere.
ER  -