Diagnostic Utility of Quantitative Strain Elastography in Breast Lesions: A Comparative Evaluation of Distance Ratio and Strain Ratio.
- 1Radiology, World College of Medical Sciences and Research, Jhajjar, IND.
- 2Radiology, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
- 3Radiodiagnosis, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, IND.
Abstract
Introduction Accurate characterization of breast masses is essential for appropriate clinical management and reduction of unnecessary invasive procedures. Quantitative strain elastography is a useful adjunct to conventional breast ultrasonography by providing an objective assessment of tissue stiffness. Although the strain ratio (SR) has been widely investigated, the diagnostic utility of the distance ratio (DR) remains relatively underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of quantitative strain elastography in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, with particular emphasis on the comparative performance of the DR and SR, using histopathology as the reference standard. Methods This prospective cross-sectional study included 30 women presenting with palpable breast masses or lesions detected on sonomammography. All patients underwent conventional breast ultrasonography followed by quantitative strain elastography. The DR and SR were recorded and compared with histopathological findings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine optimal cutoff values and evaluate the diagnostic performance of both parameters. Results Histopathological examination revealed 20 (66.7%) malignant and 10 (33.3%) benign breast lesions. The mean DR was significantly higher in malignant lesions than in benign lesions (1.60 ± 0.27 vs. 1.06 ± 0.11; p < 0.001). At a cutoff value of 1.23, the DR demonstrated 95% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), 90.9% negative predictive value (NPV), and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 96.7%. The mean SR was also significantly higher in malignant than in benign lesions (7.41 ± 3.73 vs. 2.21 ± 1.05; p < 0.001). At a cutoff value of 3.61, the SR demonstrated 95% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 93.3%. Conclusions Both DR and SR demonstrated promising diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in this cohort. Quantitative strain elastography may serve as an adjunct to conventional breast ultrasonography; however, the findings do not establish the superiority of either parameter. Larger studies involving independent cohorts are needed to validate the derived cutoff values and determine the reproducibility and clinical applicability of these parameters.
Related
- Application of a Quantitative POCT-FIT Based on Near-Infrared Fluorescence Immunochromatography in Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Comparative Evaluation with a Centralized Testing System
- Shear Wave Elastography of the Abductor Pollicis Brevis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Relationship with Quantitative Motor Unit Potential and Nerve Conduction Parameters
- Intraoperative evaluation of spinal cord tension by shear wave elastography (SWE): a biomechanical study on an ovine model
- Perioperative shear wave elastography for the evaluation of spinal cord release in pediatric dysraphism: first experience in 21 patients
- Shear wave elastography for quantitative assessment of nerve tissue stiffness after sciatic nerve decompression in diabetic rats
BibTeX
@article{yadav2026diagnostic,
title = {{Diagnostic Utility of Quantitative Strain Elastography in Breast Lesions: A Comparative Evaluation of Distance Ratio and Strain Ratio.}},
author = {Preeti Yadav and Arindam Mukherjee and Riya Samanta},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.118871},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968750},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Diagnostic Utility of Quantitative Strain Elastography in Breast Lesions: A Comparative Evaluation of Distance Ratio and Strain Ratio.
AU - Preeti Yadav
AU - Arindam Mukherjee
AU - Riya Samanta
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/31
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.118871
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42968750
AB - Introduction Accurate characterization of breast masses is essential for appropriate clinical management and reduction of unnecessary invasive procedures. Quantitative strain elastography is a useful adjunct to conventional breast ultrasonography by providing an objective assessment of tissue stiffness. Although the strain ratio (SR) has been widely investigated, the diagnostic utility of the distance ratio (DR) remains relatively underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of quantitative strain elastography in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, with particular emphasis on the comparative performance of the DR and SR, using histopathology as the reference standard. Methods This prospective cross-sectional study included 30 women presenting with palpable breast masses or lesions detected on sonomammography. All patients underwent conventional breast ultrasonography followed by quantitative strain elastography. The DR and SR were recorded and compared with histopathological findings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine optimal cutoff values and evaluate the diagnostic performance of both parameters. Results Histopathological examination revealed 20 (66.7%) malignant and 10 (33.3%) benign breast lesions. The mean DR was significantly higher in malignant lesions than in benign lesions (1.60 ± 0.27 vs. 1.06 ± 0.11; p < 0.001). At a cutoff value of 1.23, the DR demonstrated 95% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), 90.9% negative predictive value (NPV), and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 96.7%. The mean SR was also significantly higher in malignant than in benign lesions (7.41 ± 3.73 vs. 2.21 ± 1.05; p < 0.001). At a cutoff value of 3.61, the SR demonstrated 95% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 93.3%. Conclusions Both DR and SR demonstrated promising diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in this cohort. Quantitative strain elastography may serve as an adjunct to conventional breast ultrasonography; however, the findings do not establish the superiority of either parameter. Larger studies involving independent cohorts are needed to validate the derived cutoff values and determine the reproducibility and clinical applicability of these parameters.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -