CT imaging biomarkers after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: from response assessment to surgical decision-making
- 1The First People’s Hospital of Changde City, Changde, Hunan, China
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade, usually combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, has improved pathologic response and event-free survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preoperative assessment remains difficult, however, because radiographic change does not directly represent the amount of residual viable tumor. Immune-cell infiltration, edema, necrosis, granulomatous nodal reactions, and reparative fibrosis may preserve tumor size despite major or complete pathologic response, whereas small viable tumor nests may remain within an apparently fibrotic bed. This Mini Review examines computed tomography (CT) biomarkers after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, focusing on conventional and dual-energy CT, radiomics, delta-radiomics, and deep-learning models. Size-based response criteria are reproducible but insufficient for tissue characterization. Selected, predominantly retrospective studies suggest that temporal models can add information, but transportability and clinical utility remain uncertain. We distinguish four intended uses: pathologic-response prediction, nodal restaging, technical resectability and operative-complexity assessment, and prognosis. Conventional CT informs anatomy and complication assessment; quantitative response models remain investigational. Suspicious new or enlarging nodes warrant tissue confirmation when the result would alter curative surgery. A structured reporting checklist links imaging uncertainty to multidisciplinary action. Imaging biomarkers should complement clinical, pathologic, and molecular data and should not currently be used to omit surgery.
Related
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts pathological response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.
- Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a multimodal machine learning approach
- Editorial: Beyond conventional biomarkers: unlocking immunotherapy response through novel biomarkers or combinatorial approaches
- Editorial: Evolving non-invasive biomarkers: chemokines and multi-omic profiling in NSCLC immunotherapy response
BibTeX
@article{li2026imaging,
title = {{CT imaging biomarkers after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: from response assessment to surgical decision-making}},
author = {Yu Li and Lan Wen},
journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1949375},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1949375},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - CT imaging biomarkers after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: from response assessment to surgical decision-making
AU - Yu Li
AU - Lan Wen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
JO - Frontiers in Medicine
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1949375
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1949375
AB - Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade, usually combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, has improved pathologic response and event-free survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preoperative assessment remains difficult, however, because radiographic change does not directly represent the amount of residual viable tumor. Immune-cell infiltration, edema, necrosis, granulomatous nodal reactions, and reparative fibrosis may preserve tumor size despite major or complete pathologic response, whereas small viable tumor nests may remain within an apparently fibrotic bed. This Mini Review examines computed tomography (CT) biomarkers after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, focusing on conventional and dual-energy CT, radiomics, delta-radiomics, and deep-learning models. Size-based response criteria are reproducible but insufficient for tissue characterization. Selected, predominantly retrospective studies suggest that temporal models can add information, but transportability and clinical utility remain uncertain. We distinguish four intended uses: pathologic-response prediction, nodal restaging, technical resectability and operative-complexity assessment, and prognosis. Conventional CT informs anatomy and complication assessment; quantitative response models remain investigational. Suspicious new or enlarging nodes warrant tissue confirmation when the result would alter curative surgery. A structured reporting checklist links imaging uncertainty to multidisciplinary action. Imaging biomarkers should complement clinical, pathologic, and molecular data and should not currently be used to omit surgery.
SN - 2296-858X
ER -