Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Verifiable Sampling for Delegated Generative Quantum Machine Learning

Abstract

Generative machine learning has shown remarkable results across a wide range of interdisciplinary tasks, motivating significant efforts toward Quantum Generative Models as a path to beyond-classical performance, given their capability of generating classically intractable distributions. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to securely delegating such computations to a powerful remote quantum server. In this work, we propose a blind and verifiable protocol for sampling that can be used for the inference phase of such quantum models. Such a protocol inherits blindness from Universal Blind Quantum Computing and achieves verifiability by exploiting known approaches based on trapification schemes. Alongside, to delegate the training phase, we discuss an extension of the previously proposed verifiable end-to-end Delegated Variational Quantum Algorithms (Inajetovic et al., Phys. Rev. Research, 2026). Beyond the usual Accept/Abort outcome characterizing verification protocols, the sampling protocol for inference also provides, even against a malicious server, an estimation of the amount of corrupted generated samples, i.e., a fine-grained feature describing the quality of the outcome connecting verification protocols and application-level benchmarking.

Related

  1. Generative learning of time series with holographic quantum circuit sampling
    Bingzhi Zhang, Matthew W. Lee, Tom Finke +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. On Certifying Source Sampling Hardness in Quantum Generative Modeling
    Chen-Yu Liu, Leonardo Placidi, Enrico Rinaldi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Quantum MeanFlow: single-shot generative sampling on NISQ hardware
    Ashish Joshi, Eshaan Mistry, Takahiko Koyama
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Quantum Fire with Delegated Cloning
    Rohit Chatterjee, Ananta Mukherjee, Vir Pathak +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Generative Quantum Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Detection using Augmented Datasets
    Sophia Knutson, Nandika Goyal, Gennaro De Luca +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{inajetovic2026verifiable,
  title = {{Verifiable Sampling for Delegated Generative Quantum Machine Learning}},
  author = {Matteo Inajetovic and Anna Pappa and Petros Wallden},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.13211},
  eprint = {2610.13211},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13211},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Verifiable Sampling for Delegated Generative Quantum Machine Learning
AU  - Matteo Inajetovic
AU  - Anna Pappa
AU  - Petros Wallden
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.13211
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13211
AB  - Generative machine learning has shown remarkable results across a wide range of interdisciplinary tasks, motivating significant efforts toward Quantum Generative Models as a path to beyond-classical performance, given their capability of generating classically intractable distributions. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to securely delegating such computations to a powerful remote quantum server. In this work, we propose a blind and verifiable protocol for sampling that can be used for the inference phase of such quantum models. Such a protocol inherits blindness from Universal Blind Quantum Computing and achieves verifiability by exploiting known approaches based on trapification schemes. Alongside, to delegate the training phase, we discuss an extension of the previously proposed verifiable end-to-end Delegated Variational Quantum Algorithms (Inajetovic et al., Phys. Rev. Research, 2026). Beyond the usual Accept/Abort outcome characterizing verification protocols, the sampling protocol for inference also provides, even against a malicious server, an estimation of the amount of corrupted generated samples, i.e., a fine-grained feature describing the quality of the outcome connecting verification protocols and application-level benchmarking.
ER  -