Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Extremal List Gaps and Inapproximability in Additive Graph Labeling

Abstract

We study a vertex-labeling analogue of the $1−2−3$ problem and its list version. For a labeling ℓ:V(G)→ℕ, let Sℓ(v)=∑w∈ N(v)ℓ(w). The additive number η(G) is the least k for which there exists ℓ:V(G)→[k] such that Sℓ(u)≠ Sℓ(v) for every uv∈ E(G), while the list additive number ηℓ(G) is the least k such that the same condition can be satisfied from every assignment of k-element lists L(v)⊂ℕ with ℓ(v)∈ L(v). We show that for every k≥2, there is a graph G with η(G)=1 and ηℓ(G)≥ k. The separation persists at the minimum possible ordinary value for positive-degree regular graphs: there is a regular graph H with η(H)=2 and ηℓ(H)≥ k. We also determine a sharp lower bound for η(G) in terms of the order and minimum degree of G, and show that the unbounded list gap persists at asymptotically extremal density. Finally, for every fixed k≥2, it is NP-hard to distinguish η(G)=2 from η(G)>k, even on asymptotically extremal dense graphs. Consequently, η(G) admits no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation unless P=NP. Together, these results reveal a robust gap phenomenon: the separation between ordinary and list additive labeling persists at the smallest possible ordinary values and even under asymptotically extremal density, while the ordinary parameter itself remains hard to approximate.

Related

  1. A general theorem in spectral extremal graph theory
    John Byrne, Dheer Noal Desai, Michael Tait
    Transactions of the American Mathematical SocietyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text24 citedCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsGeometry & topologyOpenAlex
  2. Extremal arborescences in graph orientations
    Jianing Liu, Zhijun Xu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. An explicit bound on the extremal function for complete graph minors
    David R. Wood
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Diameter and radius of an additive-multiplicative graph
    Yi Hu, Nan Yang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Extremal Lin--Lu--Yau Curvature: Graph Density, Girth, and Short Cycles
    Qing Xia
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ahadi2026extremal,
  title = {{Extremal List Gaps and Inapproximability in Additive Graph Labeling}},
  author = {Arash Ahadi and Sharareh Alipour},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.12234},
  eprint = {2609.12234},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12234},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Extremal List Gaps and Inapproximability in Additive Graph Labeling
AU  - Arash Ahadi
AU  - Sharareh Alipour
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.12234
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12234
AB  - We study a vertex-labeling analogue of the $1−2−3$ problem and its list version. For a labeling ℓ:V(G)→ℕ, let S_ℓ(v)=∑_w∈ N(v)ℓ(w). The additive number η(G) is the least k for which there exists ℓ:V(G)→[k] such that S_ℓ(u)≠ S_ℓ(v) for every uv∈ E(G), while the list additive number η_ℓ(G) is the least k such that the same condition can be satisfied from every assignment of k-element lists L(v)⊂ℕ with ℓ(v)∈ L(v). We show that for every k≥2, there is a graph G with η(G)=1 and η_ℓ(G)≥ k. The separation persists at the minimum possible ordinary value for positive-degree regular graphs: there is a regular graph H with η(H)=2 and η_ℓ(H)≥ k. We also determine a sharp lower bound for η(G) in terms of the order and minimum degree of G, and show that the unbounded list gap persists at asymptotically extremal density. Finally, for every fixed k≥2, it is NP-hard to distinguish η(G)=2 from η(G)>k, even on asymptotically extremal dense graphs. Consequently, η(G) admits no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation unless P=NP. Together, these results reveal a robust gap phenomenon: the separation between ordinary and list additive labeling persists at the smallest possible ordinary values and even under asymptotically extremal density, while the ordinary parameter itself remains hard to approximate.
ER  -