Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
223,421 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJDS communications

Safety aspects of using iodoform as a methane-mitigating feed additive to dairy cows: Impacts of milk and serum on bovine mammary and human intestinal epithelial cell lines

  1. 1Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, Aarhus University Viborg, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark

Abstract

Ongoing research investigates the use of bromoform and other brominated halomethanes as antimethanogenic additives for ruminant livestock. Recently, iodoform has also been shown to be a potent methane inhibitor in dairy cows. To evaluate potential associated effects of using iodoform as a feed additive, cell viability assays were conducted using 2 cell lines: bovine mammary epithelial cells (MAC-T) and human intestinal epithelial cells (FHs 74 Int.), representing mammary and intestinal epithelial cell models, respectively. Cells were cultivated in media containing 1%, 5%, or 10% (vol/vol) of milk whey or blood serum sampled from multicannulated (ruminal, duodenal, and ileal) Danish Holstein dairy cows that were dosed intraruminally daily with iodoform (0, 320, 640, and 800 mg/d). The iodoform dosages were determined based on a previous unpublished pilot study. Moreover, we also investigated the effects of the direct addition of 7 different concentrations (0.003–10 µM) of the pure compounds iodoform, diiodomethane, and iodomethane on the viability of MAC-T cells. Cell viability was increased in both MAC-T and FHs 74 Int. cell lines with increased concentration of serum or whey, whether from control (0 mg/d) or iodoform-supplemented cows. No significant linear or quadratic effects of serum or whey were observed on either cell line. Consistent with these findings, MAC-T cell viability was unaffected by exposure to iodoform or its reduced form, iodomethane, across concentrations of 0.003 to 7 µM. In contrast, diiodomethane reduced cell viability at concentrations >0.5 µM; however, these levels exceed those expected in vivo following iodoform supplementation. Overall, intraruminal administration of iodoform to dairy cows was not associated with adverse effects of serum or whey on MAC-T or FHs 74 Int. cell viability.

Related

  1. Comparative Efficacy of Fermented and Unfermented Ethanolic Rooibos Extracts in Mitigating LPS‐Induced Intestinal Inflammation and Barrier Dysfunction
    Shana De Bruyn‐Orr, Mariam Rado, Claudia Abrahams +2
    Food science & nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Intestinal epithelial- or hepatocyte-specific deletion of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor does not alter ethanol-induced liver disease in mice
    David Schöler, Maximilian Joseph Brol, Aenne Harberts +5
    Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  3. ARHGEF2 isoform switching couples intestinal epithelial barrier function with autophagic host defense response to pathogens
    Shuyuan Chen, Alka Diwaker, Xi Li +14
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  4. Intestinal Epithelial Piezo1–Serotonin Signaling Contributes to Vascular Injury in Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
    Lizhi Han, Yuxi Wang, Ping Wang +5
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Bacteroides fragilis Toxin Induces Extracellular Domain Cleavage of HER2 in Intestinal Epithelial Cells.
    Sang-Hyeon Yoo, Ha-Neul Jang, Da-Hye Kang +4
    International journal of molecular sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ronn2026safety,
  title = {{Safety aspects of using iodoform as a methane-mitigating feed additive to dairy cows: Impacts of milk and serum on bovine mammary and human intestinal epithelial cell lines}},
  author = {Marie Rønn and Mirka Thorsteinsson and Mette Olaf Nielsen and Stig Purup},
  journal = {JDS communications},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.3168/jdsc.2025-1048},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13751233},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Safety aspects of using iodoform as a methane-mitigating feed additive to dairy cows: Impacts of milk and serum on bovine mammary and human intestinal epithelial cell lines
AU  - Marie Rønn
AU  - Mirka Thorsteinsson
AU  - Mette Olaf Nielsen
AU  - Stig Purup
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/06
JO  - JDS communications
DO  - 10.3168/jdsc.2025-1048
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13751233
AB  - Ongoing research investigates the use of bromoform and other brominated halomethanes as antimethanogenic additives for ruminant livestock. Recently, iodoform has also been shown to be a potent methane inhibitor in dairy cows. To evaluate potential associated effects of using iodoform as a feed additive, cell viability assays were conducted using 2 cell lines: bovine mammary epithelial cells (MAC-T) and human intestinal epithelial cells (FHs 74 Int.), representing mammary and intestinal epithelial cell models, respectively. Cells were cultivated in media containing 1%, 5%, or 10% (vol/vol) of milk whey or blood serum sampled from multicannulated (ruminal, duodenal, and ileal) Danish Holstein dairy cows that were dosed intraruminally daily with iodoform (0, 320, 640, and 800 mg/d). The iodoform dosages were determined based on a previous unpublished pilot study. Moreover, we also investigated the effects of the direct addition of 7 different concentrations (0.003–10 µM) of the pure compounds iodoform, diiodomethane, and iodomethane on the viability of MAC-T cells. Cell viability was increased in both MAC-T and FHs 74 Int. cell lines with increased concentration of serum or whey, whether from control (0 mg/d) or iodoform-supplemented cows. No significant linear or quadratic effects of serum or whey were observed on either cell line. Consistent with these findings, MAC-T cell viability was unaffected by exposure to iodoform or its reduced form, iodomethane, across concentrations of 0.003 to 7 µM. In contrast, diiodomethane reduced cell viability at concentrations >0.5 µM; however, these levels exceed those expected in vivo following iodoform supplementation. Overall, intraruminal administration of iodoform to dairy cows was not associated with adverse effects of serum or whey on MAC-T or FHs 74 Int. cell viability.
SN  - 2666-9102
ER  -