Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Current Status, Clinical Outcomes and Socioeconomic Challenges of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Japan Compared with Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review

  1. 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan

Abstract

Multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was introduced in Japan in the 1990s, with uniportal VATS (U-VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) following in the 2010s. U-VATS gained significant traction after the 1st Fellowship of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery (JACS; currently the Japanese Society for Thoracic Surgery, JSTS) in 2018, leading to the establishment of the Japanese Uniportal VATS Interest Group (JUVIG) in April 2018. JUVIG has since driven wider adoption through extensive activities, including educational programs, publications, and collaborative multicenter studies. As a result, expert surgeons now utilize U-VATS for complex procedures such as bronchoplasty, completion lobectomy, complex segmentectomy, and pediatric surgery. Concurrently, RATS gained insurance coverage in Japan in 2018 and has become more prevalent than U-VATS. Despite the significant costs associated with RATS, its adoption rate surpasses that of U-VATS due to institutional policies, perceived ease of implementation, branding, recruitment incentives, and recent national healthcare insurance reimbursement revisions (add-ons) introduced in 2026, which may create administrative pressure to prioritize robotic cases. Although reduced-port RATS is gaining popularity—blurring the lines with U-VATS—and newly emerging indigenous robotic platforms are expected to further accelerate RATS adoption, multiportal VATS (M-VATS) remains the dominant approach in many institutions. Furthermore, maintaining proficiency in VATS, U-VATS, and open thoracotomy remains indispensable for surgical education, economic viability, and acute intraoperative crisis management. Ultimately, while U-VATS represents a promising minimally invasive option, its widespread adoption for major and complex resections in Japan continues to be restricted by both educational and societal barriers.

Related

  1. Comparative efficacy of uniportal and multiportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Tubeless thoracoscopic carinal resection via a subcutaneous tunneled periareolar uniportal approach: A case report
    Zhenyuan Yang, Maohui Chen, Chenhui Ni +7
    JTCVS techniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Cellular immunotherapy for lung cancer: current clinical evidence, translational challenges, and future perspectives: a narrative review
    Nannan Ma, Chunxiang Shang
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Cancer Treatment Abandonment in Africa: A Narrative Review of Socioeconomic Determinants, Clinical Consequences and Strategies for Improving Treatment Completion
    Oderinde C, Bello O, Kurere BJ +2
    Ibom Medical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  5. Takotsubo Syndrome in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Current Evidence, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives—A Narrative Review
    Małgorzata Kosek-Nikołajczuk, Radosław Piątkowski, Marcin Grabowski +1
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cardiovascular medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{homma2026current,
  title = {{Current Status, Clinical Outcomes and Socioeconomic Challenges of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Japan Compared with Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review}},
  author = {Takahiro Homma and Shota Awane and Moeka Tamura and Norifumi Kakizaki and Takayuki Hatakeyama and Kanji Otsubo and Hiroki Sakai and Hideki Marushima and Koji Kojima and Hisashi Saji},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18203318},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3318},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Current Status, Clinical Outcomes and Socioeconomic Challenges of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Japan Compared with Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review
AU  - Takahiro Homma
AU  - Shota Awane
AU  - Moeka Tamura
AU  - Norifumi Kakizaki
AU  - Takayuki Hatakeyama
AU  - Kanji Otsubo
AU  - Hiroki Sakai
AU  - Hideki Marushima
AU  - Koji Kojima
AU  - Hisashi Saji
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18203318
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3318
AB  - Multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was introduced in Japan in the 1990s, with uniportal VATS (U-VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) following in the 2010s. U-VATS gained significant traction after the 1st Fellowship of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery (JACS; currently the Japanese Society for Thoracic Surgery, JSTS) in 2018, leading to the establishment of the Japanese Uniportal VATS Interest Group (JUVIG) in April 2018. JUVIG has since driven wider adoption through extensive activities, including educational programs, publications, and collaborative multicenter studies. As a result, expert surgeons now utilize U-VATS for complex procedures such as bronchoplasty, completion lobectomy, complex segmentectomy, and pediatric surgery. Concurrently, RATS gained insurance coverage in Japan in 2018 and has become more prevalent than U-VATS. Despite the significant costs associated with RATS, its adoption rate surpasses that of U-VATS due to institutional policies, perceived ease of implementation, branding, recruitment incentives, and recent national healthcare insurance reimbursement revisions (add-ons) introduced in 2026, which may create administrative pressure to prioritize robotic cases. Although reduced-port RATS is gaining popularity—blurring the lines with U-VATS—and newly emerging indigenous robotic platforms are expected to further accelerate RATS adoption, multiportal VATS (M-VATS) remains the dominant approach in many institutions. Furthermore, maintaining proficiency in VATS, U-VATS, and open thoracotomy remains indispensable for surgical education, economic viability, and acute intraoperative crisis management. Ultimately, while U-VATS represents a promising minimally invasive option, its widespread adoption for major and complex resections in Japan continues to be restricted by both educational and societal barriers.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -