Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Correcting for Evidence Uncertainty in the Templated Background Search for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background

Abstract

We report a new source of systematic bias in the Bayesian Templated Background Search (TBS) for the astrophysical stochastic gravitational-wave background. This bias arises from the statistical uncertainty in nested sampling evidence estimates at the segment level and persists even when the likelihood model accurately characterizes the data. Using an analytically tractable model and a frequency-domain mock data analysis with an astrophysically motivated binary black hole population, we show that this uncertainty coherently inflates the inferred duty cycle by up to an order of magnitude when millions of segments are accumulated. We propose a simple and efficient correction and demonstrate its effectiveness across all tested configurations. We also find that a search prior restricted to high optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) misattributes intermediate-strength signals, while extending the prior to support weaker signals amplifies the evidence uncertainty. Both the correction and careful search prior design are essential for robust inference as TBS analyses scale to upcoming observing runs.

Related

  1. Polarized Anisotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background Search with Ground-Based Detector Networks
    Töre Boybeyi, Vuk Mandic
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. A Delayed Rejection Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Multi-Resolution Maps of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with Pulsar Timing Array Data
    Taha T. Moursy, Nihan S. Pol
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  3. Thermalization of the Primordial Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background
    Hongguang Zhang, Zhengyang Qiu, Sirui Wang +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Modeling Uncertainties in Modified Gravity Predictions for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background
    Rodrigo Fraga, Rafael C. Nunes
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Stochastic gravitational-wave background from self-interacting superradiant clouds
    Yin-Da Guo, Richard Brito, Chen Yuan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kou2026correcting,
  title = {{Correcting for Evidence Uncertainty in the Templated Background Search for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background}},
  author = {Xiao-Xiao Kou and Argyro Sasli and Muhammed Saleem and Vuk Mandic},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.27254},
  eprint = {2609.27254},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27254},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Correcting for Evidence Uncertainty in the Templated Background Search for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background
AU  - Xiao-Xiao Kou
AU  - Argyro Sasli
AU  - Muhammed Saleem
AU  - Vuk Mandic
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.27254
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27254
AB  - We report a new source of systematic bias in the Bayesian Templated Background Search (TBS) for the astrophysical stochastic gravitational-wave background. This bias arises from the statistical uncertainty in nested sampling evidence estimates at the segment level and persists even when the likelihood model accurately characterizes the data. Using an analytically tractable model and a frequency-domain mock data analysis with an astrophysically motivated binary black hole population, we show that this uncertainty coherently inflates the inferred duty cycle by up to an order of magnitude when millions of segments are accumulated. We propose a simple and efficient correction and demonstrate its effectiveness across all tested configurations. We also find that a search prior restricted to high optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) misattributes intermediate-strength signals, while extending the prior to support weaker signals amplifies the evidence uncertainty. Both the correction and careful search prior design are essential for robust inference as TBS analyses scale to upcoming observing runs.
ER  -