Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Finite-Sample Optimal Conformal Prediction Sets under Covariate Shift

Abstract

We study conformal prediction under covariate shift with a known covariate density ratio, seeking prediction sets with minimum expected length under the target distribution. For every calibration sample size, we prove that the rule combining the inverse conditional-density score with randomized weighted conformal calibration minimizes this expected length among all rules valid over the full weighted-exchangeability class. We approximate the oracle using quantile and kernel histograms, including forest-weighted estimators, and select estimators and tuning parameters by resampling to estimate calibrated target length. On a bounded response domain, we bound excess length linearly in L1 density error at fixed calibration size, without requiring a uniform positive lower bound on the true density. We also bound selection-pool and resampling errors. Under explicit growth conditions, the selected procedure approaches the same oracle while the calibration size remains fixed. Experiments on 36 known-density configurations and four public regression datasets compare coverage, prediction-set length, and runtime with existing methods. In targeted low-coverage and strong-shift comparisons, inverse-density selection yields shorter mean sets in most cases and lower mean runtime than the evaluated weighted baselines, with some differences in achieved coverage.

Related

  1. Backward Conformal Prediction under Covariate Shift
    Amin Meghrazi, Yuanyuan Li
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Sharp training-conditional coverage for conformal prediction under covariate shift
    Mehrdad Pournaderi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Sketched Calibration for Conformal Prediction under Covariate Shift
    Mehrdad Pournaderi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Sample-Efficient Generative Conformal Prediction
    Minxing Zheng, Shixiang Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Minimum Volume Optimal Transport for Multivariate Conformal Prediction
    Chuchen Zhang, Haojie Ren, Zhaojun Wang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{li2026finitesample,
  title = {{Finite-Sample Optimal Conformal Prediction Sets under Covariate Shift}},
  author = {Zhongyang Li},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.37866},
  eprint = {2610.37866},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37866},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Finite-Sample Optimal Conformal Prediction Sets under Covariate Shift
AU  - Zhongyang Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.37866
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37866
AB  - We study conformal prediction under covariate shift with a known covariate density ratio, seeking prediction sets with minimum expected length under the target distribution. For every calibration sample size, we prove that the rule combining the inverse conditional-density score with randomized weighted conformal calibration minimizes this expected length among all rules valid over the full weighted-exchangeability class. We approximate the oracle using quantile and kernel histograms, including forest-weighted estimators, and select estimators and tuning parameters by resampling to estimate calibrated target length. On a bounded response domain, we bound excess length linearly in L^1 density error at fixed calibration size, without requiring a uniform positive lower bound on the true density. We also bound selection-pool and resampling errors. Under explicit growth conditions, the selected procedure approaches the same oracle while the calibration size remains fixed. Experiments on 36 known-density configurations and four public regression datasets compare coverage, prediction-set length, and runtime with existing methods. In targeted low-coverage and strong-shift comparisons, inverse-density selection yields shorter mean sets in most cases and lower mean runtime than the evaluated weighted baselines, with some differences in achieved coverage.
ER  -