Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.)

Ubiquitin-specific proteases and the immune microenvironment in cervical cancer: mechanistic evidence, immunotherapy resistance, and therapeutic perspectives

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Binhai County People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
  2. 2Department of Gastroenterology, Binhai County People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
  3. 3Department of Pharmacy, Binhai County People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
  4. 4Department of General Surgery, Binhai County People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
  5. 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a major global health burden, and resistance limits the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) regulate protein homeostasis and may connect human papillomavirus-associated oncogenesis with immune evasion. This narrative review evaluates USP-dependent mechanisms relevant to cervical cancer, distinguishing disease-specific findings from evidence in other tumor types and proposed pathways. Cervical cancer studies support USP7-associated immune-checkpoint regulation and USP14-dependent MCT4 stabilization and lactate export, although the immune consequences of the latter remain inferred. Evidence linking USPs to regulatory T-cell function, STING signaling, antigen presentation, and immunosuppressive metabolism derives largely from non-cervical experimental systems. The proposed E6–USP7 and E7–USP1 immune pathways therefore require direct validation. We discuss small-molecule inhibitors, targeted protein degradation and stabilization, combination strategies, and biomarker development. Compensatory USP Reprogramming (CUR) and a proposed USP-based tumor immune microenvironment (USP-TIME) framework are presented as hypotheses for investigating treatment-associated adaptation and the relationship between USP profiles and immune architecture, respectively. Therapeutic development must account for the possibility that USP inhibition also impairs antigen presentation or effector lymphocyte function. Although USP-directed approaches provide a rationale for further investigation, their clinical benefit in cervical cancer remains unproven. Progress requires cell-type-resolved mechanistic studies, immunocompetent models, validated pharmacodynamic assays, and compound-specific safety assessment.

Related

  1. Epigenetic plasticity in cancer drug resistance: mechanistic insights and strategies for therapeutic intervention
    Wei Zhao, Jing-xuan Pan
    Acta Pharmacologica SinicaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  2. Immune cell-derived exosomes in the tumor microenvironment: mechanisms of immune evasion and emerging therapeutic strategies in cancer immunotherapy
    Rashid Mir, Mohammad Fahad Ullah, Mamdoh S. Moawadh +11
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  3. Bidirectional mitochondrial transfer in the osteoimmune microenvironment: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives
    Lei Huang, Xin Chen, Yuqin Guo +5
    Frontiers in EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  4. The Gut Microbiota–Epigenome Axis in Bariatric Surgery: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Perspectives
    Mohammed Y. Ezzi
    MetabolitesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Dual‐Targeted M1 Macrophage Extracellular Vesicles Reprogram the Tumor Microenvironment and Enhance Natural Killer Cell Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Su Jin Kang, Gichan Baek, Suwun Ju +3
    Journal of Extracellular VesiclesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026ubiquitinspecific,
  title = {{Ubiquitin-specific proteases and the immune microenvironment in cervical cancer: mechanistic evidence, immunotherapy resistance, and therapeutic perspectives}},
  author = {Yanhua Zhang and Liling Zhu and Lei Xia and Hui Cheng and Weipei Zhu and Hongyou Wang},
  journal = {Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.neo.2026.101378},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2026.101378},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ubiquitin-specific proteases and the immune microenvironment in cervical cancer: mechanistic evidence, immunotherapy resistance, and therapeutic perspectives
AU  - Yanhua Zhang
AU  - Liling Zhu
AU  - Lei Xia
AU  - Hui Cheng
AU  - Weipei Zhu
AU  - Hongyou Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.)
DO  - 10.1016/j.neo.2026.101378
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2026.101378
AB  - Cervical cancer remains a major global health burden, and resistance limits the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) regulate protein homeostasis and may connect human papillomavirus-associated oncogenesis with immune evasion. This narrative review evaluates USP-dependent mechanisms relevant to cervical cancer, distinguishing disease-specific findings from evidence in other tumor types and proposed pathways. Cervical cancer studies support USP7-associated immune-checkpoint regulation and USP14-dependent MCT4 stabilization and lactate export, although the immune consequences of the latter remain inferred. Evidence linking USPs to regulatory T-cell function, STING signaling, antigen presentation, and immunosuppressive metabolism derives largely from non-cervical experimental systems. The proposed E6–USP7 and E7–USP1 immune pathways therefore require direct validation. We discuss small-molecule inhibitors, targeted protein degradation and stabilization, combination strategies, and biomarker development. Compensatory USP Reprogramming (CUR) and a proposed USP-based tumor immune microenvironment (USP-TIME) framework are presented as hypotheses for investigating treatment-associated adaptation and the relationship between USP profiles and immune architecture, respectively. Therapeutic development must account for the possibility that USP inhibition also impairs antigen presentation or effector lymphocyte function. Although USP-directed approaches provide a rationale for further investigation, their clinical benefit in cervical cancer remains unproven. Progress requires cell-type-resolved mechanistic studies, immunocompetent models, validated pharmacodynamic assays, and compound-specific safety assessment.
SN  - 1522-8002
SN  - 1476-5586
ER  -