The resilience–distress paradox in HIV: latent profiles reveal that resilience compensates for low mindfulness
9 affiliations
- 1Department of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 2Department of Allergy, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 3Department of Geriatrics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 4Medical Social Work Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 5Department of General Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 6Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 7Department of Scientific Research, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 8Department of Neuropsychology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 9Party Committee Office, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Abstract
Background: People living with HIV (PLWH) face elevated risks for anxiety and depression, yet not all develop clinically significant distress—a phenomenon we term the resilience-distress paradox, whereby individuals with high psychological resilience (the capacity to adapt positively to adversity) nonetheless experience severe distress. Drawing on a person-centered approach, this study identified distinct psychological adaptation profiles based on mindfulness, resilience, anxiety, and depression, and examined their associations with quality of life, social support, and sociodemographics.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 403 people living with HIV (mean age 35.5 years; 86.1% male) was conducted. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was based on the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, the Brief Resilience Scale, the GAD-7, and the PHQ-9. Analysis of variance and chi-square tests examined profile differences in quality of life, social support, and clinical variables; hierarchical regressions tested the mindfulness × resilience interaction on distress.
Results: Three profiles emerged: Well-Adapted (52.4%), Moderate (39.7%), and Distressed (7.9%). Mindfulness showed a strict gradient across profiles (all p <0.001), whereas resilience did not differ between the Moderate and Distressed profiles (p = 0.073, d = 0.44). Quality of life followed the same gradient. Perceived social support was higher in the Well-Adapted than in the Moderate profile, but neither profile differed significantly from the Distressed profile. Sexual orientation distribution also differed across profiles: heterosexual individuals were significantly underrepresented and homosexual individuals significantly overrepresented in the Distressed profile, whereas identity-uncertain individuals showed only a non-significant trend toward overrepresentation.
Conclusion: PLWH exhibit substantial heterogeneity in psychological adaptation. Interaction analyses revealed that resilience buffered anxiety and depression at all levels of mindfulness, with the strongest protection where mindfulness was lowest. This compensatory pattern, rather than a threshold effect, suggests that resilience can partially substitute for limited mindfulness, whereas the absence of both resources creates the greatest vulnerability. These findings support stratified interventions tailored to individuals' resource profiles.
Related
- A five-day Mindfulness Based Intervention to reduce burnout and psychological distress in UK Medical Students
- The awareness-distress paradox: Traffic-related air pollution awareness and psychological distress among the parents of urban schoolchildren in a northeastern province, Thailand
- Effect of neurofeedback-assisted mindfulness training on migraine severity, associated disability, sleep quality, and emotional distress: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- Symptom burden, Psychosocial Distress, Resilience and Health-Related Quality of Life in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Contemporary Systemic Therapy
- Virtual reality mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for reducing psychological distress in people with depression and/or anxiety symptoms: two uncontrolled feasibility studies.
BibTeX
@article{chen2026resiliencedistress,
title = {{The resilience–distress paradox in HIV: latent profiles reveal that resilience compensates for low mindfulness}},
author = {Fang Chen and Xixi Yan and Xiaomin Ding and Juan Li and Shihua Pan and Ling Feng and Xiaoxia Zhang and Yueling Wu and Huimin Sun and Hongyun Xu},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1950568},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1950568},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The resilience–distress paradox in HIV: latent profiles reveal that resilience compensates for low mindfulness
AU - Fang Chen
AU - Xixi Yan
AU - Xiaomin Ding
AU - Juan Li
AU - Shihua Pan
AU - Ling Feng
AU - Xiaoxia Zhang
AU - Yueling Wu
AU - Huimin Sun
AU - Hongyun Xu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1950568
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1950568
AB - Background: People living with HIV (PLWH) face elevated risks for anxiety and depression, yet not all develop clinically significant distress—a phenomenon we term the resilience-distress paradox, whereby individuals with high psychological resilience (the capacity to adapt positively to adversity) nonetheless experience severe distress. Drawing on a person-centered approach, this study identified distinct psychological adaptation profiles based on mindfulness, resilience, anxiety, and depression, and examined their associations with quality of life, social support, and sociodemographics. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 403 people living with HIV (mean age 35.5 years; 86.1% male) was conducted. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was based on the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, the Brief Resilience Scale, the GAD-7, and the PHQ-9. Analysis of variance and chi-square tests examined profile differences in quality of life, social support, and clinical variables; hierarchical regressions tested the mindfulness × resilience interaction on distress. Results: Three profiles emerged: Well-Adapted (52.4%), Moderate (39.7%), and Distressed (7.9%). Mindfulness showed a strict gradient across profiles (all p <0.001), whereas resilience did not differ between the Moderate and Distressed profiles (p = 0.073, d = 0.44). Quality of life followed the same gradient. Perceived social support was higher in the Well-Adapted than in the Moderate profile, but neither profile differed significantly from the Distressed profile. Sexual orientation distribution also differed across profiles: heterosexual individuals were significantly underrepresented and homosexual individuals significantly overrepresented in the Distressed profile, whereas identity-uncertain individuals showed only a non-significant trend toward overrepresentation. Conclusion: PLWH exhibit substantial heterogeneity in psychological adaptation. Interaction analyses revealed that resilience buffered anxiety and depression at all levels of mindfulness, with the strongest protection where mindfulness was lowest. This compensatory pattern, rather than a threshold effect, suggests that resilience can partially substitute for limited mindfulness, whereas the absence of both resources creates the greatest vulnerability. These findings support stratified interventions tailored to individuals' resource profiles.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -