Anisotropy and tracer-profile assumptions in aperture-based strong-lens dynamics: Conditional inference from supernova distance ratios and unresolved stellar kinematics
Abstract
Single-aperture stellar kinematics jointly constrain the mass distribution, tracer light profile, and velocity anisotropy. Their coupling affects the interpretation of an inferred anisotropy. We quantify how tracer-profile assumptions and data treatment affect common-anisotropy comparisons and inferred mass-density slopes in a compiled galaxy-scale lens sample. We analyse 107 lenses using distinct \pantheon\ supernova counterparts, spatial flatness, distance duality, and the full supernova covariance. We compare the individual-slope power-law tracer with Hernquist and Sérsic profiles using measured effective radii. Numerical Jeans solutions, likelihood comparisons, posterior distributions, and controlled recovery experiments quantify the effects of tracer representation. The power-law fixed-minus-free Bayesian information criterion differences are 6.74 for isotropy and 41.51 for fixed β=0.18, compared with −3.89 and −2.26 for Hernquist and −4.67 and −4.30 for Sérsic n=4. The preference also changes with Sérsic index. Removing 12 systems with linearised distance-ratio uncertainty above 20\% reduces the power-law isotropy comparison to 2.51. In isotropic Sérsic n=4 and Hernquist simulations, power-law fits yield ΔBIC0>6 in 60.0\% and 50.0\% of realisations, respectively, compared with 0.5\% and 1.0\% for matched-tracer fits.} {The preference for a common free anisotropy parameter depends on the tracer representation and sample composition. Controlled recovery identifies tracer mismatch as one mechanism that can generate this preference within the adopted aperture models. Physical interpretation requires joint treatment of photometry, distance uncertainties, and kinematic weighting.
Related
- Learning Galaxy Kinematics from Spatially Unresolved Spectra
- Testing Spin Prior Assumptions of Binary Black Hole Parameter Inference and Their Astrophysical Implications
- Unresolved triples in the open cluster NGC 2437 (M 46) confirmed by the KMOS VVVX-GalCen Spectroscopic Survey
- Towards breaking the degeneracy between stellar ages and unresolved multiplicity
- On the Clustering Bias of Unresolved Gamma-Ray Sources
BibTeX
@misc{hu2026anisotropy,
title = {{Anisotropy and tracer-profile assumptions in aperture-based strong-lens dynamics: Conditional inference from supernova distance ratios and unresolved stellar kinematics}},
author = {Jian Hu and Yi Liu and Chen Wang and Jian-Ping Hu and Jia Zhao and Liangqing Zhu and Zhongmu Li},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.19615},
eprint = {2605.19615},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19615},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Anisotropy and tracer-profile assumptions in aperture-based strong-lens dynamics: Conditional inference from supernova distance ratios and unresolved stellar kinematics
AU - Jian Hu
AU - Yi Liu
AU - Chen Wang
AU - Jian-Ping Hu
AU - Jia Zhao
AU - Liangqing Zhu
AU - Zhongmu Li
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.19615
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19615
AB - Single-aperture stellar kinematics jointly constrain the mass distribution, tracer light profile, and velocity anisotropy. Their coupling affects the interpretation of an inferred anisotropy. We quantify how tracer-profile assumptions and data treatment affect common-anisotropy comparisons and inferred mass-density slopes in a compiled galaxy-scale lens sample. We analyse 107 lenses using distinct \pantheon\ supernova counterparts, spatial flatness, distance duality, and the full supernova covariance. We compare the individual-slope power-law tracer with Hernquist and Sérsic profiles using measured effective radii. Numerical Jeans solutions, likelihood comparisons, posterior distributions, and controlled recovery experiments quantify the effects of tracer representation. The power-law fixed-minus-free Bayesian information criterion differences are 6.74 for isotropy and 41.51 for fixed β=0.18, compared with −3.89 and −2.26 for Hernquist and −4.67 and −4.30 for Sérsic n=4. The preference also changes with Sérsic index. Removing 12 systems with linearised distance-ratio uncertainty above 20\% reduces the power-law isotropy comparison to 2.51. In isotropic Sérsic n=4 and Hernquist simulations, power-law fits yield ΔBIC_0>6 in 60.0\% and 50.0\% of realisations, respectively, compared with 0.5\% and 1.0\% for matched-tracer fits.} {The preference for a common free anisotropy parameter depends on the tracer representation and sample composition. Controlled recovery identifies tracer mismatch as one mechanism that can generate this preference within the adopted aperture models. Physical interpretation requires joint treatment of photometry, distance uncertainties, and kinematic weighting.
ER -