Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

Formal Bipolar Weighted Semantics for Generalized Argumentation Frameworks

  • Stefano Ferilli1
  1. 1Department of Computer Science, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70100 Bari, Italy
Open at sourceDOICite

Abstract

Argumentation is the inferential strategy aimed at coping with inconsistent knowledge within a logic theory. Abstract argumentation is based on a graph model where nodes are uninterpreted claims and arcs denote relationships between pairs of claims. Different frameworks provide different expressive power and different strategies (‘semantics’) to decide which arguments are justified. The Generalized Argumentation Framework was proposed as a unifying model that can simulate major pre-existing frameworks in the literature and combine them into a single, seamless model. It also provides additional power. This paper discusses its formal properties and proposes and investigates different evaluation strategies and semantics that can leverage its specific features and full power.

Related

  1. Higher-Order Quadripolar Argumentation Framework and Encoded Semantics
    Shuai Tang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  2. Generalized Stević–Sharma operators on weighted Dirichlet spaces
    Guo Zhitao
    Demonstratio MathematicaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  3. Norm of the generalized Hilbert operator on weighted Bergman spaces
    Dongxing Li, Songxiao Li, Weiye Pan +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Nadler Theorem on Generalized Metric Spaces with Weighted Graphs
    Ismat Beg, Muhammad Aslam Javed
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. On weighted Schatten p-numerical radii via generalized Aluthge transformation
    Kallal Pal, Sumit Chandok
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{ferilli2026formal,
  title = {{Formal Bipolar Weighted Semantics for Generalized Argumentation Frameworks}},
  author = {Stefano Ferilli},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/math14213901},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/21/3901},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Formal Bipolar Weighted Semantics for Generalized Argumentation Frameworks
AU  - Stefano Ferilli
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14213901
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/21/3901
AB  - Argumentation is the inferential strategy aimed at coping with inconsistent knowledge within a logic theory. Abstract argumentation is based on a graph model where nodes are uninterpreted claims and arcs denote relationships between pairs of claims. Different frameworks provide different expressive power and different strategies (‘semantics’) to decide which arguments are justified. The Generalized Argumentation Framework was proposed as a unifying model that can simulate major pre-existing frameworks in the literature and combine them into a single, seamless model. It also provides additional power. This paper discusses its formal properties and proposes and investigates different evaluation strategies and semantics that can leverage its specific features and full power.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -