Beyond IHC-Vicariation duality: precision-stratified rTMS for post-stroke motor recovery
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, China Medical University
- 2Department of China Medical University, The Queen’s University of Belfast Joint College, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University
- 3School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast
- 4Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore
Abstract
Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in adults, and refractory upper extremity motor dysfunction severely compromises patients’ ability to live independently. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which promotes neuroplasticity by modulating cortical excitability, has emerged as a highly promising therapeutic approach. However, its clinical efficacy exhibits high heterogeneity, mainly because current therapeutic strategies are guided by two seemingly opposing neuroscientific models. The classic Interhemispheric Competition (IHC) model advocates for inhibiting the unaffected hemisphere, while the emerging Vicariation model proposes leveraging compensatory functions of the unaffected hemisphere. This review aims to reconcile this theoretical divergence from a dialectical perspective and propose a biomarker-based individualized stratified treatment framework. The article first systematically reviews the neurophysiological evidence for both models, demonstrating that they are not mutually exclusive but rather applicable to different stages of neurological injury severity. Subsequently, it focuses on elaborating how the structural reserve assessment system, centered on corticospinal tract (CST) integrity and motor evoked potential (MEP), serves as a decision-making fulcrum to guide the selection of rTMS strategies including inhibition, excitation or bilateral modulation. The article proposes an evidence-informed stratification framework and explores the potential synergistic effects of emerging techniques such as theta-burst stimulation (TBS) and peripheral-central combined stimulation. Through multimodal patient stratification, this framework aims to support more individualized and mechanistically informed application of rTMS in post-stroke motor rehabilitation.
Related
- Advancing Therapeutics for Children with Medical Complexity: The Role of Model‐Informed Precision Dosing and Genotype‐Stratified Trials
- Prehabilitation and Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in head and neck cancers: a protocol for a prospective, stratified, open-label randomised controlled trial in adults (PreERA)
- Impact of an Age-Stratified Augmented Take-Home Ration on Nutritional Recovery in Under-Five Children With Uncomplicated SAM: A Community-Based Prospective Study in Southern Jharkhand.
- Beyond Symptom Control: Remission as a Depth-Stratified Treatment Goal in Severe Asthma
- Recovery from catatonia follows a hierarchical precision order
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026beyond,
title = {{Beyond IHC-Vicariation duality: precision-stratified rTMS for post-stroke motor recovery}},
author = {Dai Zhang and Chenyu Zhao and Yuewen Ma},
journal = {Frontiers in Neurology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1856547},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1856547/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Beyond IHC-Vicariation duality: precision-stratified rTMS for post-stroke motor recovery
AU - Dai Zhang
AU - Chenyu Zhao
AU - Yuewen Ma
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1856547
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1856547/full
AB - Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in adults, and refractory upper extremity motor dysfunction severely compromises patients’ ability to live independently. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which promotes neuroplasticity by modulating cortical excitability, has emerged as a highly promising therapeutic approach. However, its clinical efficacy exhibits high heterogeneity, mainly because current therapeutic strategies are guided by two seemingly opposing neuroscientific models. The classic Interhemispheric Competition (IHC) model advocates for inhibiting the unaffected hemisphere, while the emerging Vicariation model proposes leveraging compensatory functions of the unaffected hemisphere. This review aims to reconcile this theoretical divergence from a dialectical perspective and propose a biomarker-based individualized stratified treatment framework. The article first systematically reviews the neurophysiological evidence for both models, demonstrating that they are not mutually exclusive but rather applicable to different stages of neurological injury severity. Subsequently, it focuses on elaborating how the structural reserve assessment system, centered on corticospinal tract (CST) integrity and motor evoked potential (MEP), serves as a decision-making fulcrum to guide the selection of rTMS strategies including inhibition, excitation or bilateral modulation. The article proposes an evidence-informed stratification framework and explores the potential synergistic effects of emerging techniques such as theta-burst stimulation (TBS) and peripheral-central combined stimulation. Through multimodal patient stratification, this framework aims to support more individualized and mechanistically informed application of rTMS in post-stroke motor rehabilitation.
SN - 1664-2295
ER -