Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,716 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Predicting Factor Decay: ML Models for Cross-Factor Predictability Erosion

Abstract

We develop ML models that predict when cross-factor predictability will erode, enabling prospective risk management. A decay prediction model achieves C-index = 0.93 on held-out factor pairs, providing early warning of signal erosion---the key predictor is initial signal strength: stronger signals decay faster (``regression to the mean''). An online regime detector enables real-time classification with 6.6-day average detection delay. Prior work explains why factors decay (arbitrage, publication effects); we predict when decay will occur. Limitation: The primary HML→SMB signal does not replicate in post-break OOS (2013--2024); this null result is consistent with genuine decay but limits confirmatory claims. Motivation: Among 30 directed Fama-French factor pairs (1990--2024), predictability targeting the Size factor (SMB) decays fastest. Of 7 pairs showing exponential decay (R2 > 0.3), 4 target SMB (Mkt-RF→SMB, CMA→SMB, HML→SMB, RMW→SMB; half-lives 2.4--4.1 years). This SMB-concentration pattern motivates the predictive models. Methodology: Using a regime-conditional Granger framework with Student-t HMMs, we document structural breaks clustering around June 1998 (p < 10−10). A pre-break OOS test (HMM trained 1990--1995, tested 1996--2007) confirms signals existed: HML→SMB shows p = 0.013 (Elevated) and p < 0.001 (Crisis). The primary HML→SMB signal does not replicate in post-break OOS (2013--2024), consistent with genuine decay rather than overfitting---after ∼6 half-lives, the expected signal is <1% of its 1990s peak. International analysis finds 2/4 non-US markets with Bonferroni-surviving OOS effects; correction for full specification search was not applied, so results remain exploratory.

Related

  1. Predicting resistance to fluoroquinolones among patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: A cross-country validation study
    Tianfang Shao, Mariana R. Neves, Molly Franke +4
    PLOS MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
  2. BER-PEF: Unified Human Mobility Predictability Evaluation via Bayes Error Rate Estimation
    En Xu, Jingtao Ding, Zhiwen Yu +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Fitness, predictability and equilibrium in biological dynamics *
    Rolando Rebolledo, Mauricio Tejo, Mara A Freilich +1
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyProbabilityHALarXiv
  4. Quantifying volumetric erosion from symbolic expression of landslide morphology
    Kushanav Bhuyan, Xuanmei Fan, Chengyong Fang +7
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeology & geochemistryGeneral mathematicsEarthArXiv
  5. The erosion of proof in paradigm transitions: the rise of narrative rationality in health technology assessment
    Jean‐christophe Lega, Arthur Gougeon, Claudina Michal +5
    Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{lee2026predicting,
  title = {{Predicting Factor Decay: ML Models for Cross-Factor Predictability Erosion}},
  author = {Chorok Lee},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.03668},
  eprint = {2611.03668},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03668},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Predicting Factor Decay: ML Models for Cross-Factor Predictability Erosion
AU  - Chorok Lee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.03668
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03668
AB  - We develop ML models that predict when cross-factor predictability will erode, enabling prospective risk management. A decay prediction model achieves C-index = 0.93 on held-out factor pairs, providing early warning of signal erosion---the key predictor is initial signal strength: stronger signals decay faster (``regression to the mean''). An online regime detector enables real-time classification with 6.6-day average detection delay. Prior work explains why factors decay (arbitrage, publication effects); we predict when decay will occur. Limitation: The primary HML→SMB signal does not replicate in post-break OOS (2013--2024); this null result is consistent with genuine decay but limits confirmatory claims. Motivation: Among 30 directed Fama-French factor pairs (1990--2024), predictability targeting the Size factor (SMB) decays fastest. Of 7 pairs showing exponential decay (R^2 > 0.3), 4 target SMB (Mkt-RF→SMB, CMA→SMB, HML→SMB, RMW→SMB; half-lives 2.4--4.1 years). This SMB-concentration pattern motivates the predictive models. Methodology: Using a regime-conditional Granger framework with Student-t HMMs, we document structural breaks clustering around June 1998 (p < 10^−10). A pre-break OOS test (HMM trained 1990--1995, tested 1996--2007) confirms signals existed: HML→SMB shows p = 0.013 (Elevated) and p < 0.001 (Crisis). The primary HML→SMB signal does not replicate in post-break OOS (2013--2024), consistent with genuine decay rather than overfitting---after ∼6 half-lives, the expected signal is <1% of its 1990s peak. International analysis finds 2/4 non-US markets with Bonferroni-surviving OOS effects; correction for full specification search was not applied, so results remain exploratory.
ER  -