Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

On technical biases in imaging spatial transcriptomics

  1. 1University of Padova

Abstract

Imaging spatial transcriptomics (iST) has revolutionized our ability to contextualize gene expression within intact tissue architectures at single-cell and subcellular resolution. However, these platforms introduce complex technical biases that span the entire measurement pipeline -- from sample preparation to data acquisition to quantification. Here, we categorize these biases into experimental (e.g., sample preservation and spatial sampling) and computational sources (e.g., z-stack registration and field-of-view stitching). Using public datasets, we demonstrate how different biases can compound and manifest, and propose a unified count modeling framework to formalize these sources of variation. Finally, we call for a more integrated understanding of iST data origins and greater knowledge sharing within and across sectors to support the prospective development of more robust experimental design and reliable downstream analysis.

Related

  1. Biological and technical spatial variation in spatial transcriptomics
    K. C. Jackson, G. Gorin, L. Pachter
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  2. Imaging-based spatial isoform transcriptomics resolves transcript diversity at cellular and subcellular resolution
    E. McAndrew, M. Fierville, M. Gautier-Isola +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Accurate and scalable decontamination of imaging-based spatial transcriptomics via optimal transport
    Y. Chen, Y. Liu, Z. Chao +9
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. A significant enrichment that is not: spatial nulls, co-expression, and the imaging transcriptomics of EEG alpha-power genetics
    J. Schenetti
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Trial-History and Spatial Biases Shape Perceptual Decision-Making in Archerfish
    O. Hendler, k. Mondal, N. Dushnik Shamir +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026technical,
  title = {{On technical biases in imaging spatial transcriptomics}},
  author = {C. Chen and L. E. Borm and A. Pascual-Reguant and I. Ruano and D. Risso and H. L. Crowell},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.16.759529},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.16.759529v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On technical biases in imaging spatial transcriptomics
AU  - C. Chen
AU  - L. E. Borm
AU  - A. Pascual-Reguant
AU  - I. Ruano
AU  - D. Risso
AU  - H. L. Crowell
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.16.759529
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.16.759529v1
AB  - Imaging spatial transcriptomics (iST) has revolutionized our ability to contextualize gene expression within intact tissue architectures at single-cell and subcellular resolution. However, these platforms introduce complex technical biases that span the entire measurement pipeline -- from sample preparation to data acquisition to quantification. Here, we categorize these biases into experimental (e.g., sample preservation and spatial sampling) and computational sources (e.g., z-stack registration and field-of-view stitching). Using public datasets, we demonstrate how different biases can compound and manifest, and propose a unified count modeling framework to formalize these sources of variation. Finally, we call for a more integrated understanding of iST data origins and greater knowledge sharing within and across sectors to support the prospective development of more robust experimental design and reliable downstream analysis.
ER  -