Kinematic encoding of the speed-accuracy trade-off in approach/avoidance decisions when facing social threats

Abstract

Perceiving social threats, especially expressions of anger, increases the speed of both action selection and execution. However, it remains unclear how individuals balance speed with achieving desirable outcomes, such as threat avoidance, under these conditions. To investigate this trade-off between decision’s speed and accuracy, we examined the kinematics of finger-reaching movements using a "go-before-you-know" paradigm. Participants chose between two empty outer chairs in a waiting room. Two central chairs were occupied by either two individuals with neutral expressions or one neutral individual and one threatening individual. The threatening individual expressed anger or fear at one of four intensity levels. The results showed that social threats generally invigorated action decision, as high-threat trials elicited faster movements, which correlated with more direct trajectories compared to neutral trials. However, when participants chose to avoid angry individuals, the most frequent response, movements followed more central trajectories, compared to when they approached angry individuals. These findings suggest that while social threats generally invigorate action selection and execution, the accumulation of evidence for the decision can be temporarily prolonged to enhance the likelihood of a favorable outcome, such as threat avoidance. We propose integrating these results with recent models of action decisions under perceived urgency to advance understanding of threat-related decision-making.

Acute stress reorganizes pregenual cingulate and subthalamic coupling to approach-avoidance decisions in remitted depression
M. Kuhn, N. R. Ging-Jehli, E. H. Palermo +13
bioRxiv8 Oct 2026PreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
Starvation transforms signal encoding in C. elegans thermoresponsive neurons and suppresses heat avoidance via bidirectional glutamatergic and peptidergic signaling.
Saurabh Thapliyal, Parvathi Sushama Gopinath, Dominique A Glauser
ELife9 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
LigRNA: High-accuracy prediction of RNA-ligand binding sites via dynamic chemical complementarity and language model encoding
X. Wang, H. Zhu, H. Li +7
bioRxiv15 Oct 2026PreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
Reduced social brain coupling to others’ face threats in narcissism
Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)1 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
Population Traits and Threats of Phengaris arion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western China
Fengming Lv, Zhaolong Wang, Suqin Shang +2
Insects1 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{mennella2026kinematic,
  title = {{Kinematic encoding of the speed-accuracy trade-off in approach/avoidance decisions when facing social threats}},
  author = {Rocco Mennella and Julie Grezes and Matteo Sequestro and Morgan Beaurenaut},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/dwgb5_v4},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dwgb5_v4/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Kinematic encoding of the speed-accuracy trade-off in approach/avoidance decisions when facing social threats
AU  - Rocco Mennella
AU  - Julie Grezes
AU  - Matteo Sequestro
AU  - Morgan Beaurenaut
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/dwgb5_v4
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dwgb5_v4/
AB  - Perceiving social threats, especially expressions of anger, increases the speed of both action selection and execution. However, it remains unclear how individuals balance speed with achieving desirable outcomes, such as threat avoidance, under these conditions. To investigate this trade-off between decision’s speed and accuracy, we examined the kinematics of finger-reaching movements using a "go-before-you-know" paradigm. Participants chose between two empty outer chairs in a waiting room. Two central chairs were occupied by either two individuals with neutral expressions or one neutral individual and one threatening individual. The threatening individual expressed anger or fear at one of four intensity levels. The results showed that social threats generally invigorated action decision, as high-threat trials elicited faster movements, which correlated with more direct trajectories compared to neutral trials. However, when participants chose to avoid angry individuals, the most frequent response, movements followed more central trajectories, compared to when they approached angry individuals. These findings suggest that while social threats generally invigorate action selection and execution, the accumulation of evidence for the decision can be temporarily prolonged to enhance the likelihood of a favorable outcome, such as threat avoidance. We propose integrating these results with recent models of action decisions under perceived urgency to advance understanding of threat-related decision-making.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite