Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Journal of Cardiology Cases

Endomyocardial biopsy after leadless pacemaker implantation in patient with suspected cardiac amyloidosis

2 more authors
  1. 1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
  2. 2Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
  3. 3Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan

Abstract

Leadless pacemakers (LPMs) are increasingly used especially in elderly patients; however, the safety of subsequent intracardiac procedures remains uncertain. We report a case of a 76-year-old man on maintenance hemodialysis with suspected cardiac amyloidosis who had previously undergone LPM implantation. Despite grade 3 uptake on technetium-99 m pyrophosphate scintigraphy, the presence of monoclonal protein and negative extracardiac biopsies necessitated endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) for definitive diagnosis. Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography demonstrated precise localization of the LPM near the right ventricular outflow tract. Based on these findings, EMB was safely performed via a femoral vein approach without device-related complications. Histopathology and gene test confirmed wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. This case highlights the importance of individualized, imaging-guided procedural planning to safely perform EMB after LPM implantation.

Learning objective: Endomyocardial biopsy remains essential for definitive diagnosis and amyloid typing in patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy who have concomitant monoclonal protein, even when bone scintigraphy is strongly positive. In patients with a previously implanted leadless pacemaker, preprocedural imaging to evaluate the spatial relationship between the device and the intended biopsy site is critical for procedural safety.

Related

  1. Successful Bailout Retrieval of an Active‐Fixation Atrial Leadless Pacemaker Following Suspected Tissue Entrapment During Repositioning
    Toshiya Yoshida, Akira Kasagawa, Daisuke Togashi +2
    Journal of arrhythmiaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. Challenging case of leadless pacemaker implantation for a patient with left-sided inferior vena cava.
    Yuki Tanaka, Masaru Yamaki, Yoshifumi Mizuguchi +1
    HeartRhythm case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  3. Internal jugular vein approach facilitating second leadless pacemaker implantation after battery depletion
    Nobuhiko Ueda, Kohei Ishibashi, Akinori Wakamiya +2
    Journal of Cardiology CasesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  4. Direct-visualization implantation of an atrial leadless pacemaker at tricuspid valve surgery.
    Pejman Mansouri, Shelief Y Robbins-Juarez, Francis Hartge +2
    HeartRhythm case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  5. Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker in a 97-year-old patient with severe kyphosis and tortuous femoral veins: a case report
    Ming-Huan Fu, Xue-Fei Tao, Jie Gao +4
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{kuyama2026endomyocardial,
  title = {{Endomyocardial biopsy after leadless pacemaker implantation in patient with suspected cardiac amyloidosis}},
  author = {Naoto Kuyama and Yasuhiro Izumiya and Akihisa Tabira and Yosuke Matsumoto and Kyoko Hirakawa and Naoki Nakayama and Shinsuke Hanatani and Hiroki Usuku and Masafumi Kidoh and Seitaro Oda and Yasushi Matsuzawa and Eiichiro Yamamoto and Mitsuharu Ueda and Kenichi Tsujita},
  journal = {Journal of Cardiology Cases},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jccase.2026.07.004},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jccase.2026.07.004},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Endomyocardial biopsy after leadless pacemaker implantation in patient with suspected cardiac amyloidosis
AU  - Naoto Kuyama
AU  - Yasuhiro Izumiya
AU  - Akihisa Tabira
AU  - Yosuke Matsumoto
AU  - Kyoko Hirakawa
AU  - Naoki Nakayama
AU  - Shinsuke Hanatani
AU  - Hiroki Usuku
AU  - Masafumi Kidoh
AU  - Seitaro Oda
AU  - Yasushi Matsuzawa
AU  - Eiichiro Yamamoto
AU  - Mitsuharu Ueda
AU  - Kenichi Tsujita
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/04
JO  - Journal of Cardiology Cases
DO  - 10.1016/j.jccase.2026.07.004
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jccase.2026.07.004
AB  - Leadless pacemakers (LPMs) are increasingly used especially in elderly patients; however, the safety of subsequent intracardiac procedures remains uncertain. We report a case of a 76-year-old man on maintenance hemodialysis with suspected cardiac amyloidosis who had previously undergone LPM implantation. Despite grade 3 uptake on technetium-99 m pyrophosphate scintigraphy, the presence of monoclonal protein and negative extracardiac biopsies necessitated endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) for definitive diagnosis. Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography demonstrated precise localization of the LPM near the right ventricular outflow tract. Based on these findings, EMB was safely performed via a femoral vein approach without device-related complications. Histopathology and gene test confirmed wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. This case highlights the importance of individualized, imaging-guided procedural planning to safely perform EMB after LPM implantation.  Learning objective: Endomyocardial biopsy remains essential for definitive diagnosis and amyloid typing in patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy who have concomitant monoclonal protein, even when bone scintigraphy is strongly positive. In patients with a previously implanted leadless pacemaker, preprocedural imaging to evaluate the spatial relationship between the device and the intended biopsy site is critical for procedural safety.
SN  - 1878-5409
ER  -