Prognostic value of gross tumour volume in laryngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, USA
- 2Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- 3Macquarie University Hospital, Australia
- 4Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK
Abstract
Objectives: Gross tumour volume has been proposed as a complementary prognostic marker in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the prognostic value of pre-treatment gross tumour volume.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting pre-treatment gross tumour volume and survival outcomes in laryngeal cancer were included. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcome was disease-free survival. Hazard ratios were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool, and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Results: Eight retrospective studies including 1351 patients were included. Increasing gross tumour volume was significantly associated with worse overall survival (pooled hazard ratio per 1 cm3 increase: 1.03; 95 per cent confidence interval: 1.02–1.05), with a similar association observed for disease-free survival. Overall risk of bias was moderate.
Conclusions: Higher gross tumour volume is independently associated with poorer survival in laryngeal cancer and may provide prognostic information beyond tumour-node-metastasis staging.
Related
- The prognostic value of tumour budding for survival in stage II and III colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
- ReCAST: Single-Cell-Informed Tumour Microenvironment Profiling for Translational Prognostic Assessment in Esophageal Cancer
- Fully automated AI-based quantification of tumour volume on PSMA PET-CT images is associated with overall survival in prostate cancer.
- PET Tumour Segmentation in Head and Neck Cancer: Reproducibility, Reader Dependence and Concordance with CT-Defined Tumour Volume in a 154-Patient Cohort
- Spatial Remodeling of the Immune Microenvironment During Laryngeal Carcinogenesis Reveals Prognostic Immune Patterns in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
BibTeX
@article{iqbal2026prognostic,
title = {{Prognostic value of gross tumour volume in laryngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
author = {Shahid Iqbal and Saad Illahi and Rumail Zaheer and Ashir Iqbal and Ely Cheikh Boussaty and Charles S. Coffey},
journal = {The Journal of Laryngology and Otology},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1017/s0022215126105313},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215126105313},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Prognostic value of gross tumour volume in laryngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Shahid Iqbal
AU - Saad Illahi
AU - Rumail Zaheer
AU - Ashir Iqbal
AU - Ely Cheikh Boussaty
AU - Charles S. Coffey
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/06
JO - The Journal of Laryngology and Otology
DO - 10.1017/s0022215126105313
UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215126105313
AB - Objectives: Gross tumour volume has been proposed as a complementary prognostic marker in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the prognostic value of pre-treatment gross tumour volume. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting pre-treatment gross tumour volume and survival outcomes in laryngeal cancer were included. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcome was disease-free survival. Hazard ratios were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool, and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Results: Eight retrospective studies including 1351 patients were included. Increasing gross tumour volume was significantly associated with worse overall survival (pooled hazard ratio per 1 cm3 increase: 1.03; 95 per cent confidence interval: 1.02–1.05), with a similar association observed for disease-free survival. Overall risk of bias was moderate. Conclusions: Higher gross tumour volume is independently associated with poorer survival in laryngeal cancer and may provide prognostic information beyond tumour-node-metastasis staging.
SN - 0022-2151
SN - 1748-5460
ER -