Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

Optimal Strategies for Gravitational-Wave Memory Detection with Noise Marginalization in Pulsar Timing Arrays

Abstract

Current pulsar timing arrays could detect gravitational wave memory, which would provide a unique test of general relativity. In order to optimize our searches for gravitational wave memory in pulsar timing arrays, we integrate the optimal frequentist statistics for GW memory into the \texttt{enterprise} code suite. We additionally test a noise marginalized version of this statistic, and compare it's effectiveness to the simpler maximum posterior method. We perform these tests on simulated pulsar timing array with red and white noise content, as well as the NANOGrav $15$-year data set. We find no significant variations in our detection statistics between the noise-marginalized and the maximum-posterior methods for the simulated datasets, and only small variations in the NANOGrav $15$-year comparisons. We conclude that for realistic PTAs the noise-marginalization method could be useful for assigning a false alarm probability to Bayesian results, though the maximum posterior method is sufficient for identifying potentially detectable signals.

Related

  1. Toward claiming a detection of gravitational memory
    Jann Zosso, Lorena Magaña Zertuche, Silvia Gasparotto +3
    Physical Review DPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedHigh-energy astrophysicsHAL
  2. Waveform models for the gravitational-wave memory effect: III. Phenomenological frequency-domain model for nonspinning binaries
    Arwa Elhashash, David A Nichols
    HALPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityHALarXiv
  3. Deep Learning Detection of Beyond-General-Relativity Deviations in Gravitational-Wave Signals: A Detection-Threshold Study with Real LIGO Noise
    Muhammad Adnan Shahzad
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. HLA-Net: A Physics-Guided Skeleton-Based Framework for Automatic Gravitational Arc Detection in Astronomical Images
    Don S
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  5. Amortized Opacity Marginalization Improves C/O Interval Calibration for Brown-Dwarf Retrievals
    Kellen Heraty
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{burnette2026optimal,
  title = {{Optimal Strategies for Gravitational-Wave Memory Detection with Noise Marginalization in Pulsar Timing Arrays}},
  author = {Rand Burnette and Xavier Siemens},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.20772},
  eprint = {2610.20772},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20772},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Optimal Strategies for Gravitational-Wave Memory Detection with Noise Marginalization in Pulsar Timing Arrays
AU  - Rand Burnette
AU  - Xavier Siemens
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.20772
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20772
AB  - Current pulsar timing arrays could detect gravitational wave memory, which would provide a unique test of general relativity. In order to optimize our searches for gravitational wave memory in pulsar timing arrays, we integrate the optimal frequentist statistics for GW memory into the \texttt{enterprise} code suite. We additionally test a noise marginalized version of this statistic, and compare it's effectiveness to the simpler maximum posterior method. We perform these tests on simulated pulsar timing array with red and white noise content, as well as the NANOGrav $15$-year data set. We find no significant variations in our detection statistics between the noise-marginalized and the maximum-posterior methods for the simulated datasets, and only small variations in the NANOGrav $15$-year comparisons. We conclude that for realistic PTAs the noise-marginalization method could be useful for assigning a false alarm probability to Bayesian results, though the maximum posterior method is sufficient for identifying potentially detectable signals.
ER  -