Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Stronger Lower Bounds for (Non-)Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descent

Abstract

The rate-optimal convergence rate of gradient descent (GD) with a fixed step-size is well known to be Θ(N−1) for L-Lipschitz smooth convex objectives in the prior art in convex optimization. Surprisingly, several recent works show that we can accelerate vanilla GD by applying a nonconstant, nonadaptive, deterministic step-size schedule. The best-known upper bounds so far in the non-anytime & anytime setups are O(N−1.271) [Altschuler and Parrilo, 2025, Grimmer et al., 2023] and O(N−1.119) [Zhang et al., 2025], respectively. On the other hand, the best reported lower bounds (or barriers) up to date in the non-anytime & anytime setups are Ω(N−1.635) and Ω(N−1.241) [Ye and Liu, 2026], respectively. We narrow these gaps by establishing stronger lower bounds for GD's convergence rate in both settings: Ω(N−1.450) for the non-anytime rate bound and Ω(N−1.184) for the anytime rate barrier.

Related

  1. Anytime-Feasible Gradient Descent for Constrained Optimization Under Gradient Uncertainty
    Sina Sharifi, Jiarui Wang, Mahyar Fazlyab
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Can Acceleration in Gradient-Norm Minimization Be Anytime? Sharp Last-Iterate Limits in Smooth Convex Optimization
    Pierre Vernimmen, François Glineur
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Improved Gradient Descent Lower Bounds Beyond Nesterov
    Yuhan Ye, Kaizhao Liu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  4. Lower Bounds on Inference Complexity for Polyak-Ruppert Averaged Stochastic Gradient Descent
    Denis Belomestny, Alexey Naumov, Sergey Samsonov
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  5. Broximal Gradient Descent: A Projection-Free Sister of Projected Gradient Descent
    Peter Richtárik, Kaja Gruntkowska, Hanmin Li
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jung2026stronger,
  title = {{Stronger Lower Bounds for (Non-)Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descent}},
  author = {Minchan Jung and Hanseul Cho and Chulhee Yun},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.04032},
  eprint = {2609.04032},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04032},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Stronger Lower Bounds for (Non-)Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descent
AU  - Minchan Jung
AU  - Hanseul Cho
AU  - Chulhee Yun
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.04032
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04032
AB  - The rate-optimal convergence rate of gradient descent (GD) with a fixed step-size is well known to be Θ(N^−1) for L-Lipschitz smooth convex objectives in the prior art in convex optimization. Surprisingly, several recent works show that we can accelerate vanilla GD by applying a nonconstant, nonadaptive, deterministic step-size schedule. The best-known upper bounds so far in the non-anytime & anytime setups are O(N^−1.271) [Altschuler and Parrilo, 2025, Grimmer et al., 2023] and O(N^−1.119) [Zhang et al., 2025], respectively. On the other hand, the best reported lower bounds (or barriers) up to date in the non-anytime & anytime setups are Ω(N^−1.635) and Ω(N^−1.241) [Ye and Liu, 2026], respectively. We narrow these gaps by establishing stronger lower bounds for GD's convergence rate in both settings: Ω(N^−1.450) for the non-anytime rate bound and Ω(N^−1.184) for the anytime rate barrier.
ER  -