Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Federated Clustering with Unknown Local and Global Cluster Cardinalities

Abstract

Federated clustering methods that do not require the global number of clusters K still assume that each client knows its local number Kg. This assumption is hard to justify when clients know no more about their data than the server does, as in fault diagnosis across independently operated industrial sites. We propose a two-phase framework in which neither count is known: each client first estimates Kg from its own data, and an aggregator that requires local counts, such as FedGEM, then uses these estimates in place of the true values. For the first phase we introduce Adaptive Split--Merge (ASM), which grows a spherical Gaussian mixture by BIC-driven splitting and then merges excess components. ASM uses no labels, selects its hyperparameters on held-out client data only, and makes no assumption about how clusters are shared across clients. We derive a closed-form split criterion whose critical cluster size falls with anisotropy and rises with dimension, and show empirically that over-fragmentation grows with the number of points per cluster, which federation divides among clients. Across eight datasets, ASM with FedGEM attains a mean ARI of 0.333, against 0.256 for the next best label-free estimator and 0.361 when the true local counts are supplied. It also gives the most reliable global estimates of K and is robust when client size is decoupled from local cardinality.

Related

  1. Federated Soft Clustering via Generalized Total Variation Minimization
    Shamsiiat Abdurakhmanova, Alexander Jung
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Selective Inference for Clustering Under Unknown Covariance
    Yiqun T. Chen, Lucy L. Gao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Privacy-Preserving Over-the-Air Federated Learning over Cell-Free Massive MIMO System with User-Centric Clustering
    Manobendu Sarker, Soumaya Cherkaoui
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Global Linear Convergence of the Proximal Bundle Method under Unknown Piecewise Smoothness and Quadratic Growth
    Zhenwei Lin, Zhe Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Personalized Federated Learning through Global Knowledge Distillation and Local Head Adaptation
    Polycarpo Souza Neto, José Mairton Barros da Silva Júnior, Charles Casimiro Cavalcante
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{goyal2026federated,
  title = {{Federated Clustering with Unknown Local and Global Cluster Cardinalities}},
  author = {Mitushi Goyal and Tarun S. and Riddhanya Senapathi and Arun Raman},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.36762},
  eprint = {2609.36762},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36762},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Federated Clustering with Unknown Local and Global Cluster Cardinalities
AU  - Mitushi Goyal
AU  - Tarun S.
AU  - Riddhanya Senapathi
AU  - Arun Raman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.36762
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36762
AB  - Federated clustering methods that do not require the global number of clusters K still assume that each client knows its local number K_g. This assumption is hard to justify when clients know no more about their data than the server does, as in fault diagnosis across independently operated industrial sites. We propose a two-phase framework in which neither count is known: each client first estimates K_g from its own data, and an aggregator that requires local counts, such as FedGEM, then uses these estimates in place of the true values. For the first phase we introduce Adaptive Split--Merge (ASM), which grows a spherical Gaussian mixture by BIC-driven splitting and then merges excess components. ASM uses no labels, selects its hyperparameters on held-out client data only, and makes no assumption about how clusters are shared across clients. We derive a closed-form split criterion whose critical cluster size falls with anisotropy and rises with dimension, and show empirically that over-fragmentation grows with the number of points per cluster, which federation divides among clients. Across eight datasets, ASM with FedGEM attains a mean ARI of 0.333, against 0.256 for the next best label-free estimator and 0.361 when the true local counts are supplied. It also gives the most reliable global estimates of K and is robust when client size is decoupled from local cardinality.
ER  -