When Stress Tests Miss the Risk: Statistical Scenario Analysis for Financial Portfolios
Abstract
Scenario analysis is widely used to stress test financial portfolios, yet conventional approaches often summarize scenario gains using point estimates that overlook dependence between stressed and unstressed risk factors. We develop a machine learning framework for quantifying uncertainty in realized next-day scenario gains through prediction intervals whose widths can be calibrated online. Adaptive conformal scenario analysis (ACSA) calibrates scenario-specific quantile predictions and provides a long-run empirical coverage guarantee over realized scenarios. Our main method, kernel scenario analysis (KSA), estimates scenario-conditional quantiles directly from the specified stress and current market information. KSA can also be combined with ACSA to obtain online-calibrated prediction intervals. In experiments designed to reflect real-world markets, conventional scenario analysis can substantially understate risk, including for portfolios that appear safe under standard stress tests. Our proposed methods achieve better calibration and sharper intervals than empirical-quantile baselines. Overall, the framework moves scenario analysis beyond point estimates by quantifying predictive uncertainty and providing tools for statistically validating scenario gains.
Related
- Statistical Inference for Scenario-Based Dynamic Optimization under Uncertainty
- When is statistical evidence strong enough? Using hypothesis tests to value data collection
- Aggregate Calibration Can Mask Stress-State Undercoverage: Bounded-Memory Forecast Intervals under Recurrent Financial Stress
- Robust tests for log-normal lifetimes under cyclic-stress accelerated tests and interval monitoring
- Robust Tests for Step-Stress Models under Exponential Lifetimes
BibTeX
@misc{cai2026when,
title = {{When Stress Tests Miss the Risk: Statistical Scenario Analysis for Financial Portfolios}},
author = {Zhongze Cai and Martin B. Haugh and Xiaocheng Li},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.37273},
eprint = {2609.37273},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37273},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - When Stress Tests Miss the Risk: Statistical Scenario Analysis for Financial Portfolios
AU - Zhongze Cai
AU - Martin B. Haugh
AU - Xiaocheng Li
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.37273
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37273
AB - Scenario analysis is widely used to stress test financial portfolios, yet conventional approaches often summarize scenario gains using point estimates that overlook dependence between stressed and unstressed risk factors. We develop a machine learning framework for quantifying uncertainty in realized next-day scenario gains through prediction intervals whose widths can be calibrated online. Adaptive conformal scenario analysis (ACSA) calibrates scenario-specific quantile predictions and provides a long-run empirical coverage guarantee over realized scenarios. Our main method, kernel scenario analysis (KSA), estimates scenario-conditional quantiles directly from the specified stress and current market information. KSA can also be combined with ACSA to obtain online-calibrated prediction intervals. In experiments designed to reflect real-world markets, conventional scenario analysis can substantially understate risk, including for portfolios that appear safe under standard stress tests. Our proposed methods achieve better calibration and sharper intervals than empirical-quantile baselines. Overall, the framework moves scenario analysis beyond point estimates by quantifying predictive uncertainty and providing tools for statistically validating scenario gains.
ER -