On the Depth Transfer of Neural Optimizers via L-Smoothness
Abstract
Scaling deep learning models efficiently requires predictable performance transfer across compute regimes. Establishing reliable hyperparameter transfer allows optimal training dynamics and structural choices to be discovered on low-cost proxy models, avoiding catastrophic failures during massive-scale training. Existing depth-transfer analyses are architecture-specific and heuristic: hyperparameter transfer is only justified through toy blocks, and both rely on infinite-depth dynamics, a specific initialization, and feature-learning criteria. Building on L-smoothness framework of Xu et al. (2026), we understand hyperparameter transfer as how do the Lipschitz and L-smoothness constants of the loss scale with the depth K? We show that inverse-depth residual branch scaling α=Θ(1/K) is sufficient to make both constants depth-independent at fixed width, uniformly over the bounded parameter domain and for arbitrary p→ q geometries. Because the bounds depend on each residual branch only through its Lipschitz and smoothness constants, the argument applies to general residual networks (including branches of block depth ≥ 2 such as transformer and ResNet blocks) without assumptions on initialization or correlations between layer weights. Since the smoothness constant controls the curvature penalty in the descent inequality, our bounds motivate a learning-rate scale without an additional depth-dependent curvature correction for updates bounded in the prescribed norm. This provides a geometric explanation of inverse-depth residual scaling and its application to the operator-norm geometries associated with AdamW, Muon, and MOGA. Learning-rate sweeps on GPT-2 (depths 2--128) and CIFAR-100 ResNets (8--32 residual blocks) confirm that Muon and MOGA exhibit stable learning-rate transfer under these prescriptions, with a common optimal rate across a 64-fold increase in depth.
Related
- Mixed-Frequency Time Series Forecasting via Depth-Separable Neural Networks
- Depth Separation for Neural Networks under Gaussian Measure
- Online Gate-Driven Flow Control in Resin Transfer Moulding Using a Neural-Network Surrogate
- On the Comparison of Optimizers for Imbalanced Learning
- Critical Optimizers for the Finite-Rank Fractional Lieb--Thirring Inequality
BibTeX
@misc{wong2026depth,
title = {{On the Depth Transfer of Neural Optimizers via L-Smoothness}},
author = {Maximilian Wong and Chenyu Xu and Jiajin Li and Yiping Lu},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.14344},
eprint = {2610.14344},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14344},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - On the Depth Transfer of Neural Optimizers via L-Smoothness
AU - Maximilian Wong
AU - Chenyu Xu
AU - Jiajin Li
AU - Yiping Lu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/09
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.14344
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14344
AB - Scaling deep learning models efficiently requires predictable performance transfer across compute regimes. Establishing reliable hyperparameter transfer allows optimal training dynamics and structural choices to be discovered on low-cost proxy models, avoiding catastrophic failures during massive-scale training. Existing depth-transfer analyses are architecture-specific and heuristic: hyperparameter transfer is only justified through toy blocks, and both rely on infinite-depth dynamics, a specific initialization, and feature-learning criteria. Building on L-smoothness framework of Xu et al. (2026), we understand hyperparameter transfer as how do the Lipschitz and L-smoothness constants of the loss scale with the depth K? We show that inverse-depth residual branch scaling α=Θ(1/K) is sufficient to make both constants depth-independent at fixed width, uniformly over the bounded parameter domain and for arbitrary p→ q geometries. Because the bounds depend on each residual branch only through its Lipschitz and smoothness constants, the argument applies to general residual networks (including branches of block depth ≥ 2 such as transformer and ResNet blocks) without assumptions on initialization or correlations between layer weights. Since the smoothness constant controls the curvature penalty in the descent inequality, our bounds motivate a learning-rate scale without an additional depth-dependent curvature correction for updates bounded in the prescribed norm. This provides a geometric explanation of inverse-depth residual scaling and its application to the operator-norm geometries associated with AdamW, Muon, and MOGA. Learning-rate sweeps on GPT-2 (depths 2--128) and CIFAR-100 ResNets (8--32 residual blocks) confirm that Muon and MOGA exhibit stable learning-rate transfer under these prescriptions, with a common optimal rate across a 64-fold increase in depth.
ER -