Inconclusive longitudinal associations between violence exposure and adolescent conduct problems: A comment on Swingler et al. (2026)
Abstract
Based on positive cross-lagged effects in data (N = 357, 51.5% female) from two waves of measurement, Swingler et al. concluded that violence exposure in early adolescence represents a prospective risk factor for conduct problems. However, it is well known that cross-lagged effects may be spurious. We fitted alternative models to data simulated to resemble the data used by Swingler et al. and found discrepant increasing, decreasing, and null effects of violence exposure on subsequent change in conduct problems depending on the analyzed model. A meta-analytic pooling of these discrepant effects did not differ significantly from zero. Hence, the findings by Swingler et al. may have been spurious and their conclusion premature. It is important for researchers to bear in mind that associations, including cross-lagged regression effects, in observational (i.e., non-experimental) data may be spurious in order not to overinterpret findings. We recommend researchers to scrutinize cross-lagged effects by fitting alternative models to data and to base conclusions on a juxtaposition of findings.
Related
- Inconclusive evidence for a mediated association between childhood adversity and resilience: A reexamination of Suriano and Valentino (2026)
- Inconclusive mediated effect of adverse childhood experiences on suicide risk among depressed adolescents: A reanalysis of Ye et al. (2026)
- Beyond Actor-Partner Associations: A Target-Trial Framework for Causal Spillover Effects in Longitudinal Dyadic Data
- Inconclusive mediated effect of empathy on perceived stress among nurses: A comment on Wang et al. (2026)
- Inconclusive prospective effects between technology acceptance, classroom distraction, and academic engagement among Chinese high school students: A reassessment of Li and Chen (2026)
BibTeX
@misc{sorjonen2026inconclusive,
title = {{Inconclusive longitudinal associations between violence exposure and adolescent conduct problems: A comment on Swingler et al. (2026)}},
author = {Kimmo Sorjonen and Bo Melin and Marika Melin},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/dxhzg_v2},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dxhzg_v2/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Inconclusive longitudinal associations between violence exposure and adolescent conduct problems: A comment on Swingler et al. (2026)
AU - Kimmo Sorjonen
AU - Bo Melin
AU - Marika Melin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/dxhzg_v2
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dxhzg_v2/
AB - Based on positive cross-lagged effects in data (N = 357, 51.5% female) from two waves of measurement, Swingler et al. concluded that violence exposure in early adolescence represents a prospective risk factor for conduct problems. However, it is well known that cross-lagged effects may be spurious. We fitted alternative models to data simulated to resemble the data used by Swingler et al. and found discrepant increasing, decreasing, and null effects of violence exposure on subsequent change in conduct problems depending on the analyzed model. A meta-analytic pooling of these discrepant effects did not differ significantly from zero. Hence, the findings by Swingler et al. may have been spurious and their conclusion premature. It is important for researchers to bear in mind that associations, including cross-lagged regression effects, in observational (i.e., non-experimental) data may be spurious in order not to overinterpret findings. We recommend researchers to scrutinize cross-lagged effects by fitting alternative models to data and to base conclusions on a juxtaposition of findings.
ER -