Distinguishing run-up height from pressure distribution during avalanche impact on narrow obstacles: mechanisms and semi-empirical prediction from three-dimensional simulations
- 1WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF (Davos, Switzerland)
- 2École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (Lausanne, Switzerland)
Abstract
In many avalanche engineering guidelines, run-up height is assumed to define the vertical extent of significant impact pressure of snow avalanches on narrow obstacles, such as cableway masts or transmission towers. Laboratory experiments indicate that this assumption is invalid in fast, inertia-driven regimes; however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, limiting the physical basis for improving design practice. To clarify these mechanisms and refine engineering formulations, we conduct a comprehensive numerical investigation using a three-dimensional Material Point Method, varying avalanche velocity and rheological parameters. Our results substantiate that run-up height and the vertical extent of significant impact pressure, which we term pressure height, are distinct quantities governed by different mechanisms. Both include a gravity-driven component controlled by avalanche rheology and independent of flow velocity. In fast flows, however, the two quantities diverge: run-up height gains a dominant inertia-driven component that scales with the square of the flow velocity, while avalanche rheology controls energy dissipation. Pressure height, by contrast, remains velocity-independent. This divergence arises from flow deflection at a dead zone near the obstacle base, where momentum is redirected and impact pressure concentrates. Building on these distinctions, we propose separate semi-empirical formulations for run-up height and pressure height. The run-up formulation follows the structure of the most common avalanche engineering guidelines, but replaces simplified avalanche-type classifications with a rheological parametrization. The pressure height relation adopts the same framework, while reflecting its distinct, velocity-independent governing mechanism.
Versions
Related
- Driving mechanisms for subsiding shells in simulations of deep moist convection
- Synergistic Wetting Mechanisms of Mixed Surfactants at Different Mixing Ratios on Anthracite: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations
- Sources and sinks of plastic debris in estuaries: A conceptual model integrating biological, physical and chemical distribution mechanisms
- Exploring the Impact of Fluoride in Drinking Water: Health Implications, Biological Mechanisms, and Worldwide Fluorosis Distribution
- Generalized covariate field (GCF): spatial-pattern and neighbourhood-distribution feature expansion improves geospatial prediction
BibTeX
@article{kohler2026distinguishing,
title = {{Distinguishing run-up height from pressure distribution during avalanche impact on narrow obstacles: mechanisms and semi-empirical prediction from three-dimensional simulations}},
author = {Michael J. Kohler and Johan Gaume and Christophe Ancey and Betty Sovilla},
journal = {Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5194/nhess-26-5167-2026},
url = {https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5167/2026/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Distinguishing run-up height from pressure distribution during avalanche impact on narrow obstacles: mechanisms and semi-empirical prediction from three-dimensional simulations
AU - Michael J. Kohler
AU - Johan Gaume
AU - Christophe Ancey
AU - Betty Sovilla
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
JO - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
DO - 10.5194/nhess-26-5167-2026
UR - https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5167/2026/
AB - In many avalanche engineering guidelines, run-up height is assumed to define the vertical extent of significant impact pressure of snow avalanches on narrow obstacles, such as cableway masts or transmission towers. Laboratory experiments indicate that this assumption is invalid in fast, inertia-driven regimes; however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, limiting the physical basis for improving design practice. To clarify these mechanisms and refine engineering formulations, we conduct a comprehensive numerical investigation using a three-dimensional Material Point Method, varying avalanche velocity and rheological parameters. Our results substantiate that run-up height and the vertical extent of significant impact pressure, which we term pressure height, are distinct quantities governed by different mechanisms. Both include a gravity-driven component controlled by avalanche rheology and independent of flow velocity. In fast flows, however, the two quantities diverge: run-up height gains a dominant inertia-driven component that scales with the square of the flow velocity, while avalanche rheology controls energy dissipation. Pressure height, by contrast, remains velocity-independent. This divergence arises from flow deflection at a dead zone near the obstacle base, where momentum is redirected and impact pressure concentrates. Building on these distinctions, we propose separate semi-empirical formulations for run-up height and pressure height. The run-up formulation follows the structure of the most common avalanche engineering guidelines, but replaces simplified avalanche-type classifications with a rheological parametrization. The pressure height relation adopts the same framework, while reflecting its distinct, velocity-independent governing mechanism.
SN - 1684-9981
ER -