Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Baer Splitting Beyond τq-Semisimplicity

Abstract

For a commutative ring R, we call an R-module B Baer if ExtR1(B,T)=0 for torsion R-module T. It is known that every Baer module is projective when R is τq-semisimple, i.e., rings whose total rings of quotients are semisimple. And it was conjectured that the converse characterizes τq-semisimple rings. We show that the converse fails in two substantially different ways. First, the failure is already systematic in the non-reduced Noetherian case. If D is a Dedekind domain which is not a field and R=D[ε]/(ε2), then every Baer R-module is projective, although R is not reduced, and thus is not τq-semisimple. Second, the converse fails even among reduced rings, and in fact among reduced coherent Bézout rings. The main tool is a countable-ring criterion. For a countable Noetherian domain D, let EC(D) be the ring of eventually constant sequences over D. If D is not a field, then every Baer EC(D)-module is projective, whereas EC(D) is reduced and has countably infinitely many minimal prime ideals, and thus is not τq-semisimple.

Related

  1. Analogues of Grün's lemma and Baer's theorem for skew left braces
    A. Ballester-Bolinches, R. Esteban-Romero, L. A. Kurdachenko +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Baer-Type Ring Characterizations of Steinberg Algebras, with Applications to Leavitt Path Algebras
    Morteza Ahmadi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. Inverse Baer deformations and finite simple skew braces of nilpotent type
    Marco Damele
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Frobenius forms and semisimplicity of cyclotomic quiver Hecke superalgebras
    Shuo Li, Lei Shi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Semisimplicity, purity and Mumford-Tate conjecture for hyper-Kähler varieties
    Kazuhiro Ito, Haitao Zou
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026baer,
  title = {{Baer Splitting Beyond $τ_q$-Semisimplicity}},
  author = {Xiaolei Zhang and Guocheng Dai},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.14338},
  eprint = {2609.14338},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14338},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Baer Splitting Beyond τ_q-Semisimplicity
AU  - Xiaolei Zhang
AU  - Guocheng Dai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/13
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.14338
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14338
AB  - For a commutative ring R, we call an R-module B Baer if Ext_R^1(B,T)=0 for torsion R-module T. It is known that every Baer module is projective when R is τ_q-semisimple, i.e., rings whose total rings of quotients are semisimple. And it was conjectured that the converse characterizes τ_q-semisimple rings. We show that the converse fails in two substantially different ways. First, the failure is already systematic in the non-reduced Noetherian case. If D is a Dedekind domain which is not a field and R=D[ε]/(ε^2), then every Baer R-module is projective, although R is not reduced, and thus is not τ_q-semisimple. Second, the converse fails even among reduced rings, and in fact among reduced coherent Bézout rings. The main tool is a countable-ring criterion. For a countable Noetherian domain D, let EC(D) be the ring of eventually constant sequences over D. If D is not a field, then every Baer EC(D)-module is projective, whereas EC(D) is reduced and has countably infinitely many minimal prime ideals, and thus is not τ_q-semisimple.
ER  -