Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

Quality of Initial MRI Reports for Soft-Tissue Sarcomas and Their Association with Radiologic Recognition of Sarcoma.

  1. 1Department of Orthopedics, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th Street, Suite 1263, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
  2. 2Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
  3. 3Department of Radiology, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Abstract

Objectives: Although MRI is the preferred modality for evaluating suspected soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs), initial MRI reports are frequently incomplete and often fail to document key features that support diagnosis, staging, and timely referral. This study assessed the quality of initial MRI reports for STSs and identified the specific reporting characteristics most strongly associated with diagnostic correlation. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 100 patients with histologically confirmed STSs presenting to a specialized sarcoma center between 2021 and 2024. Initial MRI reports performed externally were analyzed for 19 characteristics based on the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology guidelines. Reports were stratified by radiologist fellowship training. Findings were compared across groups, and individual MRI features were assessed for correlation with final histopathologic diagnosis. Results: Overall, initial MRI reporting was incomplete, with most features documented in fewer than 70% of cases. Reports by MSK radiologists were higher in quality, more often included bone involvement, peritumoral edema, and suspicion of malignancy. Diagnostic correlation was significantly greater for MSK radiologists compared to general radiologists (p = 0.027). Documentation of heterogeneity, depth, gadolinium use, necrosis, and suspicion of malignancy were all strongly associated with diagnostic correlation. Conclusions: Initial MRI reports for STSs frequently lack key diagnostic features, but MSK fellowship-trained radiologists produce higher-quality reports and demonstrate stronger diagnostic concordance. Standardized reporting frameworks may ultimately improve patient care and would benefit from direct evaluation in future studies.

Related

  1. The Adoption of Medicaid Expansion and Its Association with Stage at Presentation and Overall Survival for Sarcomas
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviewsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Odontogenic Sinusitis: Clinical, Radiologic, and Quality-of-Life Characterization in a Prospective Study.
    Narjesse Kemcha, Helena Rey-Martínez, Pedro Luis Ruiz-Sáenz +3
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Association of tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA dynamics with radiologic disease assessment in a single-center real-world sarcoma cohort
    Branko Calukovic, Katrin Benzler, Martin Schulze +5
    BMC CancerPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Beyond Initial Crisis Recognition: Suicide-Risk Responses of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini Across 14-Turn Ukrainian-Language Conversations
    Hryhorii Kuzyk, Oleg Salamon, Liliia Andreieva +1
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  5. Accuracy and fairness of facial recognition technology in real-world, low-quality police images: An experiment
    Maria Cuellar, Hon Kiu James To, Arush Mehrotra
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurosciencePhysiologyPLOSEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{kholodovsky2026quality,
  title = {{Quality of Initial MRI Reports for Soft-Tissue Sarcomas and Their Association with Radiologic Recognition of Sarcoma.}},
  author = {Eric Kholodovsky and Jacob Jahn and Aneesh Samineni and Sergio J Torralbas Fitz and Jean Jose and Ty Subhawong and H Thomas Temple},
  journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193130},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882284},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quality of Initial MRI Reports for Soft-Tissue Sarcomas and Their Association with Radiologic Recognition of Sarcoma.
AU  - Eric Kholodovsky
AU  - Jacob Jahn
AU  - Aneesh Samineni
AU  - Sergio J Torralbas Fitz
AU  - Jean Jose
AU  - Ty Subhawong
AU  - H Thomas Temple
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
JO  - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diagnostics16193130
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882284
AB  - Objectives: Although MRI is the preferred modality for evaluating suspected soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs), initial MRI reports are frequently incomplete and often fail to document key features that support diagnosis, staging, and timely referral. This study assessed the quality of initial MRI reports for STSs and identified the specific reporting characteristics most strongly associated with diagnostic correlation. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 100 patients with histologically confirmed STSs presenting to a specialized sarcoma center between 2021 and 2024. Initial MRI reports performed externally were analyzed for 19 characteristics based on the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology guidelines. Reports were stratified by radiologist fellowship training. Findings were compared across groups, and individual MRI features were assessed for correlation with final histopathologic diagnosis. Results: Overall, initial MRI reporting was incomplete, with most features documented in fewer than 70% of cases. Reports by MSK radiologists were higher in quality, more often included bone involvement, peritumoral edema, and suspicion of malignancy. Diagnostic correlation was significantly greater for MSK radiologists compared to general radiologists (p = 0.027). Documentation of heterogeneity, depth, gadolinium use, necrosis, and suspicion of malignancy were all strongly associated with diagnostic correlation. Conclusions: Initial MRI reports for STSs frequently lack key diagnostic features, but MSK fellowship-trained radiologists produce higher-quality reports and demonstrate stronger diagnostic concordance. Standardized reporting frameworks may ultimately improve patient care and would benefit from direct evaluation in future studies.
SN  - 2075-4418
ER  -