Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Dated public evidence and known genes for retrospective evaluation of gene prioritization

  1. 1Pfizer Inc.

Abstract

Retrospective evaluation of gene prioritization needs evidence that was public before the evaluated genes became known. Public resources are open and reproducible, but are distributed as current releases that also contain evidence produced after the genes became known. This Data Descriptor presents per-gene evidence tables for four areas (oncology, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolism and psoriasis) from public resources. Every feature carries a time axis, the date of its release in a calendar of 183 archived releases of 20 sources, and a leakage axis, a provenance class (A to E) with two risk grades that define five feature sets. Nineteen lists of known genes are dated by the first trial, study, release or classification that supports each gene. They cover targets of a kind of drug, targets of drugs tested in a disease, and genes associated with a disease. The oncology lists also carry the first day the trial registry showed the trial.

Related

  1. Towards transformation-focused evaluation: Evidence from a meta-evaluation of innovative green public procurement
    Natalie Gravett-Foyn, Lena Neij
    PLOS Sustainability and TransformationPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPLOS
  2. miRAssist: a context-aware, evidence integration framework for interpretable miRNA-target prioritization
    A. Ring, Y. Xi
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  3. ZebraSeek integrates complementary facial and clinical evidence for rare disease prioritization
    Naoya Yoshikuwa, Hirokazu Chiba, Teppei Okazaki +7
    BioHackrXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsOSF
  4. The Spatial Structure of Competitive Interactions: Evidence From Public Procurement Networks in Quebec
    Iván Marin, Jean Dubé, Julie Le Gallo
    International Regional Science ReviewPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyHAL
  5. Smallholder farmers' preferences for public expenditure priorities to support maize productivity: evidence from a best–worst scaling experiment in western Kenya
    Fido Orawo, Dickson Okello, John Olwande
    Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyNutritionDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{huang2026dated,
  title = {{Dated public evidence and known genes for retrospective evaluation of gene prioritization}},
  author = {C.-H. Huang and Y. Wang},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.04.764446},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.764446v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Dated public evidence and known genes for retrospective evaluation of gene prioritization
AU  - C.-H. Huang
AU  - Y. Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.04.764446
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.04.764446v1
AB  - Retrospective evaluation of gene prioritization needs evidence that was public before the evaluated genes became known. Public resources are open and reproducible, but are distributed as current releases that also contain evidence produced after the genes became known. This Data Descriptor presents per-gene evidence tables for four areas (oncology, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolism and psoriasis) from public resources. Every feature carries a time axis, the date of its release in a calendar of 183 archived releases of 20 sources, and a leakage axis, a provenance class (A to E) with two risk grades that define five feature sets. Nineteen lists of known genes are dated by the first trial, study, release or classification that supports each gene. They cover targets of a kind of drug, targets of drugs tested in a disease, and genes associated with a disease. The oncology lists also carry the first day the trial registry showed the trial.
ER  -