Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Functional Connectivity Differences Underly Variable Centralized Symptom Relief After Hysterectomy

1 more authors
  1. 1University of Michigan Medical School

Abstract

Approximately 1 in 4 women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) report persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy. Centralized symptoms-fatigue, multisite pain, and sleep disturbance, quantified using the Fibromyalgia Survey Score (FSS)-often co-occur with this risk, but the trajectory of centralized symptom burden after surgery, independent of pelvic pain outcome, is not well understood. Whether presurgical differences in central nervous system pain processing distinguish women whose centralized symptoms improve (improvers) from those whose do not (non-improvers) has not been tested. In this observational study, we assessed whether individuals who do and do not report improvement in FSS scores six months post-operatively differ in their baseline/pre-operative phenotypes and brain function. Sensory sensitivity scores were significantly higher in non-improvers than in improvers at baseline. We identified no significant, presurgical differences in age, average pelvic pain intensity, widespread pain, or pain interference between improvers and non-improvers. Functional connectivity was examined at rest and during the application of a distal, sustained pressure pain. We identified no significant group differences at rest. During sustained pressure pain, non-improvers showed greater connectivity than improvers between primary somatosensory cortex and posterior thalamic seeds with frontal, motor, cerebellar and limbic regions, but lower connectivity between the periaqueductal gray and subgenual cingulate cortex. Non-improvers also showed a greater pain-evoked increase in connectivity between the pelvic and leg representations of the primary sensory cortex and other sensorimotor regions in the pain-versus-rest contrast. Overall, non-improvers showed increased functional connectivity between regions associated with the multisensory integration of ascending pain, and decreased connectivity between regions associated with descending pain modulation. In exploratory analyses, some of these connections were additionally associated with symptom burden: sensory sensitivity, number of painful regions, and pain interference. This work may inform mechanisms of persistent symptom burden and guide surgical decision-making in patients with high central sensitization.

Related

  1. Full-Term and Preterm Differences in Human Brain Functional Connectivity Development Across Birth
    L. Ji, D. Cotter, S. Banker +2
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Loss of FMRP leads to translationally relevant functional connectivity differences in a rat model of Fragile X Syndrome
    J. Ye, J. A. B. Surl, A. G. McKechanie +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Between-group differences in resting-state functional connectivity within the brain’s extended triple-network following genuine and sham chiropractic adjustments: a quasi-experimental pilot trial
    Stephanie Sullivan, Margaret Sliwka, Emily Drake +1
    Frontiers in human neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC
  4. Personalized Prediction of Differences in fMRI Connectivity Estimates Across Preprocessing Pipelines
    Y. Maximov, A. Volkov, T. Chattopadhyay +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Functional connectivity in cerebral visual impairment: implications for daily visual behaviors
    Negin Nadvar, Chan-Mi Kim, Marie Drottar +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{mclain2026functional,
  title = {{Functional Connectivity Differences Underly Variable Centralized Symptom Relief After Hysterectomy}},
  author = {N. McLain and C. Kaplan and S. Harte and M. Lenert and J. Evanski and E. Hidalgo-Lopez and M. Egan and E. Ichesco and R. E. Harris and J. Kutch and D. Clauw and S. As-Sanie and A. Schrepf},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.26.754679},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.26.754679v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Functional Connectivity Differences Underly Variable Centralized Symptom Relief After Hysterectomy
AU  - N. McLain
AU  - C. Kaplan
AU  - S. Harte
AU  - M. Lenert
AU  - J. Evanski
AU  - E. Hidalgo-Lopez
AU  - M. Egan
AU  - E. Ichesco
AU  - R. E. Harris
AU  - J. Kutch
AU  - D. Clauw
AU  - S. As-Sanie
AU  - A. Schrepf
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.26.754679
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.26.754679v1
AB  - Approximately 1 in 4 women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) report persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy. Centralized symptoms-fatigue, multisite pain, and sleep disturbance, quantified using the Fibromyalgia Survey Score (FSS)-often co-occur with this risk, but the trajectory of centralized symptom burden after surgery, independent of pelvic pain outcome, is not well understood. Whether presurgical differences in central nervous system pain processing distinguish women whose centralized symptoms improve (improvers) from those whose do not (non-improvers) has not been tested. In this observational study, we assessed whether individuals who do and do not report improvement in FSS scores six months post-operatively differ in their baseline/pre-operative phenotypes and brain function. Sensory sensitivity scores were significantly higher in non-improvers than in improvers at baseline. We identified no significant, presurgical differences in age, average pelvic pain intensity, widespread pain, or pain interference between improvers and non-improvers. Functional connectivity was examined at rest and during the application of a distal, sustained pressure pain. We identified no significant group differences at rest. During sustained pressure pain, non-improvers showed greater connectivity than improvers between primary somatosensory cortex and posterior thalamic seeds with frontal, motor, cerebellar and limbic regions, but lower connectivity between the periaqueductal gray and subgenual cingulate cortex. Non-improvers also showed a greater pain-evoked increase in connectivity between the pelvic and leg representations of the primary sensory cortex and other sensorimotor regions in the pain-versus-rest contrast. Overall, non-improvers showed increased functional connectivity between regions associated with the multisensory integration of ascending pain, and decreased connectivity between regions associated with descending pain modulation. In exploratory analyses, some of these connections were additionally associated with symptom burden: sensory sensitivity, number of painful regions, and pain interference. This work may inform mechanisms of persistent symptom burden and guide surgical decision-making in patients with high central sensitization.
ER  -