Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

DUET: sequence-only prediction of RNA-small molecule binding sites

  1. 1Jingdezhen Ceramic University

Abstract

Sequence-only predictors can score RNAs without experimental structures, but continuously updated training pools can reabsorb benchmark chains. Test overlap and within-training redundancy are often handled together, although they affect evaluation differently. DUET combines a relational graph tower with two convolutional sequence towers built on frozen RNA language models. We removed 98 of 388 training and validation records reaching 80% identity to canonical test chains, retained 110 sequence-identical records, and isolated 115 homology components across folds. Across 10 paired seeds, DUET reached 0.240 +/- 0.013 MCC versus 0.192 +/- 0.031 for CoBRA-M3 on the same data (Delta = +0.047; Holm p = 0.0073), with parallel gains in AUC and AUPRC. DUET and GRASSP were statistically indistinguishable on external sets (0.246 versus 0.243 MCC). Real three-dimensional topology improved MCC by +0.037 over shuffled edges and by +0.042 over predicted secondary structure. Increasing the training pool from 80 to 290 records raised DUET by +0.135 MCC. Benchmark evaluation therefore requires separate controls for test overlap and within-training redundancy.

Related

  1. Canonical EDS1/PAD4 small-molecule binding sites are required for LRR-RP-mediated pattern-triggered immunity
    Judith Fliegmann, Denis Janocha, Chenlei Hua +6
    Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND6 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  2. Functional analysis of small-molecule and protein binding domains using monomeric streptavidin-based two-component biosensors
    R. Mutschler, Z. Guo, M. M. Fiorito +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  3. LigRNA: High-accuracy prediction of RNA-ligand binding sites via dynamic chemical complementarity and language model encoding
    X. Wang, H. Zhu, H. Li +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. MtbAIM: AI/ML-guided endpoint-specific prediction of small-molecule activity across drug-susceptible and drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    J. Singh, K. Singh
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. Nanoarchitecture of the presynaptic cell adhesion molecule PTPσ in relation to prospective vesicle fusion sites and postsynaptic NMDA receptors
    E. M. DeMarco Hibbs, S. Mitias, R. Aitken +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{xiong2026duet,
  title = {{DUET: sequence-only prediction of RNA-small molecule binding sites}},
  author = {K. Xiong and J. Jia},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.28.762699},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.762699v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - DUET: sequence-only prediction of RNA-small molecule binding sites
AU  - K. Xiong
AU  - J. Jia
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.28.762699
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.762699v1
AB  - Sequence-only predictors can score RNAs without experimental structures, but continuously updated training pools can reabsorb benchmark chains. Test overlap and within-training redundancy are often handled together, although they affect evaluation differently. DUET combines a relational graph tower with two convolutional sequence towers built on frozen RNA language models. We removed 98 of 388 training and validation records reaching 80% identity to canonical test chains, retained 110 sequence-identical records, and isolated 115 homology components across folds. Across 10 paired seeds, DUET reached 0.240 +/- 0.013 MCC versus 0.192 +/- 0.031 for CoBRA-M3 on the same data (Delta = +0.047; Holm p = 0.0073), with parallel gains in AUC and AUPRC. DUET and GRASSP were statistically indistinguishable on external sets (0.246 versus 0.243 MCC). Real three-dimensional topology improved MCC by +0.037 over shuffled edges and by +0.042 over predicted secondary structure. Increasing the training pool from 80 to 290 records raised DUET by +0.135 MCC. Benchmark evaluation therefore requires separate controls for test overlap and within-training redundancy.
ER  -