Weighting Scheme and Construction in IPCW Survival Estimation
Abstract
Inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) is widely used to address dependent censoring in survival analysis. Beyond estimation of the censoring distribution, its implementation requires specifying how inverse probability weights are incorporated into survival estimators. IPCW does not uniquely determine this construction, and different choices can produce different finite-sample behavior even under the same censoring model. In this work, we examine a class of IPCW estimators for the survival function, distinguishing hazard-based from margin-based formulations and time-varying from fixed weighting schemes. We show how these choices affect structural validity, stability, and finite-sample performance. In particular, the weight-changing hazard (WCH) estimator applies time-varying censoring weights within a product-limit construction with risk-set normalization, ensuring monotonicity and boundedness when the weighted risk-set denominators are positive. Through simulation studies under varying levels of covariate-dependent and administrative censoring, we demonstrate that WCH achieves favorable bias--variance tradeoffs and improved finite-sample stability relative to the alternative IPCW constructions examined, particularly in settings with few observed events or heavy censoring. We further illustrate these differences using data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS), in which alternative IPCW constructions produced meaningfully different survival curves. Overall, our findings emphasize that the effectiveness of IPCW depends on both the weighting scheme and the estimator formulation. Careful consideration of these choices is therefore important for reliable survival estimation under dependent censoring.
Related
- A Nonconvex Framework for Joint Sparse Sample Weighting and Parameter Estimation
- Keeping Score: Adaptive, Tuning-Free Loss Weighting for Score-Augmented Neural Ratio Estimation
- Adaptive spline-based weighting functions for blended survival curve extrapolation
- A nonequilibrium-capturing unified gas-kinetic scheme I: discrete orthogonal basis construction and expansion on velocity space
- A Coupled Fluid Naghdi Shell Windkessel Model for Pulmonary Artery Banding: Partitioned Numerical Scheme and Parameter Estimation
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026weighting,
title = {{Weighting Scheme and Construction in IPCW Survival Estimation}},
author = {Ruohui Chen and Shuhan Liu and Scott Zuo and Lihui Zhao and Hui Zhang and Xin Tu and Dung-Tsa Chen and Qianxing Mo},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.38102},
eprint = {2610.38102},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38102},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Weighting Scheme and Construction in IPCW Survival Estimation
AU - Ruohui Chen
AU - Shuhan Liu
AU - Scott Zuo
AU - Lihui Zhao
AU - Hui Zhang
AU - Xin Tu
AU - Dung-Tsa Chen
AU - Qianxing Mo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.38102
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38102
AB - Inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) is widely used to address dependent censoring in survival analysis. Beyond estimation of the censoring distribution, its implementation requires specifying how inverse probability weights are incorporated into survival estimators. IPCW does not uniquely determine this construction, and different choices can produce different finite-sample behavior even under the same censoring model. In this work, we examine a class of IPCW estimators for the survival function, distinguishing hazard-based from margin-based formulations and time-varying from fixed weighting schemes. We show how these choices affect structural validity, stability, and finite-sample performance. In particular, the weight-changing hazard (WCH) estimator applies time-varying censoring weights within a product-limit construction with risk-set normalization, ensuring monotonicity and boundedness when the weighted risk-set denominators are positive. Through simulation studies under varying levels of covariate-dependent and administrative censoring, we demonstrate that WCH achieves favorable bias--variance tradeoffs and improved finite-sample stability relative to the alternative IPCW constructions examined, particularly in settings with few observed events or heavy censoring. We further illustrate these differences using data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS), in which alternative IPCW constructions produced meaningfully different survival curves. Overall, our findings emphasize that the effectiveness of IPCW depends on both the weighting scheme and the estimator formulation. Careful consideration of these choices is therefore important for reliable survival estimation under dependent censoring.
ER -