Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Calorimetry as inference: the information content of particle showers and the limits of energy measurement

Abstract

A calorimeter does not measure the energy of a particle, it infers it from the record the absorption process leaves behind. Energy conservation writes every event as an accounting ledger, E = E_dis + E_B + E_esc + E_nu, of which only the dissipated component contributes to signal, so resolution is limited by how well the record of the dissipation constrains the missing entries. We formalize this: records form a lattice on which information is monotone; thinning a Poisson record scales Fisher information exactly by the retention; clustered records read out as sums cost the 1/(1+cv^2); and the quadrature budget a/sqrt(E) (+) b is the floor of every summed readout. The "ultimate limits" of hadronic calorimetry are identified as the first rung of a ladder, the residual spread of the invisible energy around a single correlated observable. We measure the ladder above that rung on Geant4 truth records of hadronic showers in copper, from the dissipated-energy sum to time-, position- and multiplicity-resolved records, with estimators validated on exactly solvable toy models. The achieved full-record value, model-conditional, is about 5.5%/sqrt(E) (+) 0.3% over 20-100 GeV, a factor 1.7-1.9 below the canonical one-functional construction on the same events (1.29% vs. 2.14% at 20 GeV). Under retrained high-precision neutron transport it moves from 1.29% to 1.30%, the dissipated-energy sum by 7%, and the gain from time structure becomes 0.17% in place of 0.28%. Dual-readout supplies the largest share of the information. Shower shape is next, almost entirely longitudinal, saturating at about one interaction length. Time structure adds nearly as much with or without shower shape, and stopped-muon neutrino losses set an estimated floor of 0.99% at 20 GeV. Every readout dimension has a measured information exchange rate, separating what new hardware can buy from what better algorithms can recover.

Related

  1. Information content of the Gamow Teller Resonance: Bayesian inference with self-consistent Skyrme models
    Zidu Lin, Gianluca Colò, Andrew W. Steiner +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNuclear physicsarXiv
  2. Cosmic topology. Part Va. Information content of the observable Universe
    Deyan P Mihaylov, Mikel Martin Barandiaran, Stefano Anselmi +14
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyGeneral physicsHAL
  3. The Entanglement Content of Quantum Measurement Bases
    Jef Pauwels, Otfried Gühne
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Spectral Information Content of Diffraction-Limited Images
    Milo Langker, Hayden Greer, Benjamin Pope +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsOptics & photonicsarXiv
  5. Bayesian inference in active microrheology with wall and particle-particle interactions
    Parajal Rai, Michelle M. A. Spanjaards, Ye Wang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chung2026calorimetry,
  title = {{Calorimetry as inference: the information content of particle showers and the limits of energy measurement}},
  author = {Wonyong Chung},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.41894},
  eprint = {2610.41894},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41894},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Calorimetry as inference: the information content of particle showers and the limits of energy measurement
AU  - Wonyong Chung
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.41894
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41894
AB  - A calorimeter does not measure the energy of a particle, it infers it from the record the absorption process leaves behind. Energy conservation writes every event as an accounting ledger, E = E_dis + E_B + E_esc + E_nu, of which only the dissipated component contributes to signal, so resolution is limited by how well the record of the dissipation constrains the missing entries. We formalize this: records form a lattice on which information is monotone; thinning a Poisson record scales Fisher information exactly by the retention; clustered records read out as sums cost the 1/(1+cv^2); and the quadrature budget a/sqrt(E) (+) b is the floor of every summed readout. The "ultimate limits" of hadronic calorimetry are identified as the first rung of a ladder, the residual spread of the invisible energy around a single correlated observable. We measure the ladder above that rung on Geant4 truth records of hadronic showers in copper, from the dissipated-energy sum to time-, position- and multiplicity-resolved records, with estimators validated on exactly solvable toy models. The achieved full-record value, model-conditional, is about 5.5%/sqrt(E) (+) 0.3% over 20-100 GeV, a factor 1.7-1.9 below the canonical one-functional construction on the same events (1.29% vs. 2.14% at 20 GeV). Under retrained high-precision neutron transport it moves from 1.29% to 1.30%, the dissipated-energy sum by 7%, and the gain from time structure becomes 0.17% in place of 0.28%. Dual-readout supplies the largest share of the information. Shower shape is next, almost entirely longitudinal, saturating at about one interaction length. Time structure adds nearly as much with or without shower shape, and stopped-muon neutrino losses set an estimated floor of 0.99% at 20 GeV. Every readout dimension has a measured information exchange rate, separating what new hardware can buy from what better algorithms can recover.
ER  -