Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Understanding decision making factors influencing referrals to vision rehabilitation services at a tertiary medical center

  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America

Abstract

Functional vision loss at any stage affects quality of life even before clinically quantified to be moderate or severe. Eye care providers as the gatekeepers to vision rehabilitation services often underestimate how small variations in functional vision loss can have a significant impact in a patient’s life. Greater provider-patient communication about vision loss is an opportunity to build trust and increase access to vision rehabilitation services to improve quality of life. Tertiary eye care centers serve the greatest number of visually impaired patients. The purpose of this study was to find what factors influenced eye care providers with vision rehabilitation service referral decision-making at a tertiary medical center. We also further studied whether decision making was influenced by the eye care provider’s specialty, volume of practice, years of practice, number of practicing locations, gender and continuing education status. Our survey found that about 77% of respondents were early (<10 years) in their career and 75% of posterior segment specialists agreed that people with any functional vision complaint should be referred to services regardless of visual acuity. Fifty-two percent of all respondents indicated the reason for low referrals to services was due to a lack of inquiry from patients. Inquiry about driving status by patients was an important factor for referral to services for 35% of respondents. Forty-five percent of respondents reported lack of vision rehabilitation providers and long wait times as a barrier to referrals. However, only 61% of respondents reported “never” to “sometimes” referring to community services. Posterior specialists attended more continuing education courses related to low vision/ vision rehabilitation than anterior segment specialists. By understanding influencers on eye care providers decision making, we will be able to make more targeted recommendations on workflow changes, continuing education and quality improvement processes to increase access to vision rehabilitation services.

Related

  1. Understanding the influencing factors of telemedicine service adoption in post-pandemic Bangladesh: An extended TAM and UTAUT2 model analysis
    Mohammad Rakibul Islam Bhuiyan, Md Abu Sayem, Niaz Makhdum
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  2. Understanding age-related changes in choice stepping responses using the diffusion decision model
    Sarah Anne Kemp, Niek Stevenson, Marlee Jay Wells +6
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  3. Understanding Public Trust in AI-Based Clinical Psychological Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study
    Yangqiong Lei, Samuel Bennett
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  4. Economic burden of pertussis, its influencing factors, and hospitalization determinants among older adults (≥ 60 years) in Zhejiang, China: a cross-sectional study (2024–2025)
    Hui Wu, Yang Zhou, Yao Zhu +2
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0MicrobiologyCrossref
  5. Protocol for integrative transcriptomic/metabolomic analysis: A case study on factors influencing the oyster-POMS disease
    Leo Duperret, Alejandro Valdivieso, Bruno Petton +15
    STAR ProtocolsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textProteomics & metabolomicsGeneral biologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{mondal2026understanding,
  title = {{Understanding decision making factors influencing referrals to vision rehabilitation services at a tertiary medical center}},
  author = {Sanbrita Mondal and Kyle D. Peterson and Bonnie J. Verges and Christina L. Thomas-Virnig},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0359154},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359154},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Understanding decision making factors influencing referrals to vision rehabilitation services at a tertiary medical center
AU  - Sanbrita Mondal
AU  - Kyle D. Peterson
AU  - Bonnie J. Verges
AU  - Christina L. Thomas-Virnig
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0359154
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359154
AB  - Functional vision loss at any stage affects quality of life even before clinically quantified to be moderate or severe. Eye care providers as the gatekeepers to vision rehabilitation services often underestimate how small variations in functional vision loss can have a significant impact in a patient’s life. Greater provider-patient communication about vision loss is an opportunity to build trust and increase access to vision rehabilitation services to improve quality of life. Tertiary eye care centers serve the greatest number of visually impaired patients. The purpose of this study was to find what factors influenced eye care providers with vision rehabilitation service referral decision-making at a tertiary medical center. We also further studied whether decision making was influenced by the eye care provider’s specialty, volume of practice, years of practice, number of practicing locations, gender and continuing education status. Our survey found that about 77% of respondents were early (<10 years) in their career and 75% of posterior segment specialists agreed that people with any functional vision complaint should be referred to services regardless of visual acuity. Fifty-two percent of all respondents indicated the reason for low referrals to services was due to a lack of inquiry from patients. Inquiry about driving status by patients was an important factor for referral to services for 35% of respondents. Forty-five percent of respondents reported lack of vision rehabilitation providers and long wait times as a barrier to referrals. However, only 61% of respondents reported “never” to “sometimes” referring to community services. Posterior specialists attended more continuing education courses related to low vision/ vision rehabilitation than anterior segment specialists. By understanding influencers on eye care providers decision making, we will be able to make more targeted recommendations on workflow changes, continuing education and quality improvement processes to increase access to vision rehabilitation services.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -