Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with monocytic differentiation: a single-center cohort study from Egypt

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt
  2. 2Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  3. 3Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
  4. 4Department of Clinical Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  5. 5Department of Clinical Pathology, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with monocytic differentiation (FAB M4/M5 subtypes) is a distinct subtype of pediatric AML characterized by aggressive clinical behavior and common extramedullary involvement. Despite therapeutic advances, outcomes remain suboptimal, particularly in resource-limited settings. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognostic markers in pediatric patients with AML, FAB M4/M5 subtypes.

Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzing 193 patients with AML, FAB M4/M5 subtypes diagnosed at the Children’s Cancer Hospital, Egypt-57357 (CCHE-57357) between January 2016 and December 2021.

Results: The cohort comprised 131 patients with M4 and 62 with M5 morphology. Median follow-up was 62.0 months among survivors and 37.6 months for the entire cohort. Three- and five-year OS were 53.1% and 48.3%; three- and five-year EFS were 48.2% and 45.5%. Five-year CIR was 23.8%. Forty-eight patients (24.9%) died during induction. Multivariate Cox regression identified MRD positivity after first induction (HR 2.868, 95% CI 1.133–7.260, p = 0.026) and monosomy 7 (HR 6.206, 95% CI 2.692–14.306, p < 0.001) as independent adverse prognostic factors. Conversely, inv(16)(p13.1;q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB::MYH11 was an independent favorable prognostic factor (HR 0.253, 95% CI 0.108–0.592, p = 0.002). 14 high-risk pediatric AML patients underwent HSCT post-induction; three experienced adverse outcomes, comprising relapses (n = 2), and acute GVHD (n = 1).

Conclusion: Genetic findings and treatment response were associated with outcome, supporting a complete diagnostic assessment. Improving survival requires precise risk stratification, MRD-guided therapy, and robust supportive care.

Related

  1. Clinical characteristics, long-term outcomes, and prognostic factors in linear IgA bullous dermatosis: A retrospective cohort study across the age spectrum in China, 2008-2025.
    Zhe Wang, Zhenzhen Wang, Wenchao Li +9
    JAAD internationalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of Ommaya reservoir-based intrathecal chemotherapy in lung cancer leptomeningeal metastasis: a retrospective cohort study
    Yuechao Yang, Mingtao Feng, Yu Xuan Ong +12
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  3. Prognostic Impact of a Simple GDMT Score on Clinical Outcomes and Cardiac Reverse Remodelling in Patients with ADHF: Insights from the JROADHF-Next Registry
    Ryuichi Matsukawa, Yasushi Mukai, Yudai Fujimoto +13
    CJC openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  4. Prevalence, Etiology, and Clinical Outcomes of Healthcare-Associated Infections in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital.
    Shahnaz Armin, Rahele Razmara, Sepideh Mirzayi +2
    GMS hygiene and infection controlPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors after first- and second-line immunotherapy in a cohort of 57 patients with refractory autoimmune encephalitis
    Jiao He, Haozhe Lu
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{ahmed2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with monocytic differentiation: a single-center cohort study from Egypt}},
  author = {Tarek Ahmed Abdelrehim Ahmed and Mahmoud Hammad and Sonya Soliman and Nahla Elsharkawy and Sherine Ibrahim Salem and Sonia Ahmed and Alaa Elhaddad},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1969723},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1969723},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with monocytic differentiation: a single-center cohort study from Egypt
AU  - Tarek Ahmed Abdelrehim Ahmed
AU  - Mahmoud Hammad
AU  - Sonya Soliman
AU  - Nahla Elsharkawy
AU  - Sherine Ibrahim Salem
AU  - Sonia Ahmed
AU  - Alaa Elhaddad
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1969723
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1969723
AB  - Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with monocytic differentiation (FAB M4/M5 subtypes) is a distinct subtype of pediatric AML characterized by aggressive clinical behavior and common extramedullary involvement. Despite therapeutic advances, outcomes remain suboptimal, particularly in resource-limited settings. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognostic markers in pediatric patients with AML, FAB M4/M5 subtypes.  Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzing 193 patients with AML, FAB M4/M5 subtypes diagnosed at the Children’s Cancer Hospital, Egypt-57357 (CCHE-57357) between January 2016 and December 2021.  Results: The cohort comprised 131 patients with M4 and 62 with M5 morphology. Median follow-up was 62.0 months among survivors and 37.6 months for the entire cohort. Three- and five-year OS were 53.1% and 48.3%; three- and five-year EFS were 48.2% and 45.5%. Five-year CIR was 23.8%. Forty-eight patients (24.9%) died during induction. Multivariate Cox regression identified MRD positivity after first induction (HR 2.868, 95% CI 1.133–7.260, p = 0.026) and monosomy 7 (HR 6.206, 95% CI 2.692–14.306, p < 0.001) as independent adverse prognostic factors. Conversely, inv(16)(p13.1;q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB::MYH11 was an independent favorable prognostic factor (HR 0.253, 95% CI 0.108–0.592, p = 0.002). 14 high-risk pediatric AML patients underwent HSCT post-induction; three experienced adverse outcomes, comprising relapses (n = 2), and acute GVHD (n = 1).  Conclusion: Genetic findings and treatment response were associated with outcome, supporting a complete diagnostic assessment. Improving survival requires precise risk stratification, MRD-guided therapy, and robust supportive care.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -