Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Optimality of Kløve Arrays within the Symmetric Kløve-Mossige Class

Abstract

Rajamunicode228ki and Koivunen asked whether minimum-redundancy symmetric Klunicode248ve-Mossige arrays with contiguous sum co-arrays are always Klunicode248ve arrays. We give a computer-assisted proof that, at every fixed sensor count, every maximizing sensor set belongs to the Klunicode248ve class. The argument classifies the overlaps between a generator and its shifted reflection, then bounds the aperture of a hypothetical optimizer outside the Klunicode248ve class. Comparing these bounds with a classical Klunicode248ve construction settles all sensor counts at least 330. An exact integer certificate covers the remaining counts from 2 through 329 and matches every equality case to a Klunicode248ve array as a complete set. Consequently, optimization within the full symmetric Klunicode248ve-Mossige class reduces to the previously known search over Klunicode248ve parameters. The theorem concerns this specified class, rather than unrestricted sparse arrays or all restricted additive bases.

Related

  1. An Exhaustive Census of Main-Diagonal Symmetric Costas Arrays of Orders 37-42
    Bogdan Dumitru, Cristian Budala
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Approximating the Gibbs Measure of Spherical Spin Glasses to Within o(N−1/2) in the Replica Symmetric Phase
    Brice Huang, Andrea Montanari, Huy Tuan Pham
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
  3. Uniqueness of the hexagonal lattice's universal optimality
    Markus Faulhuber, Philipp Petersen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Optimality of finite field dimension expanders
    Urban Jezernik, Markus Reineke
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryProbabilityarXiv
  5. Pareto optimality under nondegeneracy at infinity
    Liguo Jiao, Jae Hyoung Lee, Tien-Son Pham
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{yan2026optimality,
  title = {{Optimality of Kløve Arrays within the Symmetric Kløve-Mossige Class}},
  author = {Lilin Yan and Hongwei Zhao},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.09239},
  eprint = {2609.09239},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09239},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Optimality of Kløve Arrays within the Symmetric Kløve-Mossige Class
AU  - Lilin Yan
AU  - Hongwei Zhao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.09239
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09239
AB  - Rajamunicode228ki and Koivunen asked whether minimum-redundancy symmetric Klunicode248ve-Mossige arrays with contiguous sum co-arrays are always Klunicode248ve arrays. We give a computer-assisted proof that, at every fixed sensor count, every maximizing sensor set belongs to the Klunicode248ve class. The argument classifies the overlaps between a generator and its shifted reflection, then bounds the aperture of a hypothetical optimizer outside the Klunicode248ve class. Comparing these bounds with a classical Klunicode248ve construction settles all sensor counts at least 330. An exact integer certificate covers the remaining counts from 2 through 329 and matches every equality case to a Klunicode248ve array as a complete set. Consequently, optimization within the full symmetric Klunicode248ve-Mossige class reduces to the previously known search over Klunicode248ve parameters. The theorem concerns this specified class, rather than unrestricted sparse arrays or all restricted additive bases.
ER  -