Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCurrent Issues in Sport Science

Making sense of digital technologies: A sociocultural perspective from sport pedagogy

  1. 1University of Augsburg

Abstract

Digitalization in sports is often discussed in terms of opportunities or risks associated with particular technologies. From a sociocultural perspective, however, digital technologies appear as profoundly ambivalent artefacts whose significance cannot be determined solely by assessing their functionality or classifying their effects. Instead, technologies are embedded in ongoing processes through which people make sense of themselves, others, and the world, while negotiating normative understandings of bodies, health, ability, or participation in sports.

Drawing on studies of health- and fitness-related social media content on Instagram (Höger, 2024) and digital assistive technologies (DATs) for blind and visually impaired (BVI) students in physical education (Höger et al., submitted; Höger & Meier, 2025; Meier et al., 2023), this keynote examines two interrelated dimensions of these processes. First, it explores how hegemonic understandings of bodies, health, and ability become embedded in digital representations, technological imaginaries, and material arrangements. On Instagram, young, slim, fit, and non-disabled bodies function as implicit standards against which other bodies are classified as desirable, normal, or in need of intervention. Fitness thereby becomes closely associated with discipline, responsibility, and self-management. In ball games involving BVI students, standardized rules, spatial arrangements, and sporting materials similarly establish apparently self-evident prerequisites for legitimate participation. DATs do not necessarily unsettle these requirements, but instead relocate the responsibility for fulfilling them from bodies to technologies imagined as adaptive, anticipatory, and infallible.

Second, the keynote demonstrates that young people do not simply adopt these meanings. They negotiate, appropriate, and sometimes resist them in situated and embodied ways. Their engagements with social media images reveal ambivalent positionings between critical distance from normative body ideals and their continuing affective appeal. Likewise, the meanings assigned to DATs shift across different situations of play. What enables participation in one situation may become distracting, restrictive, or dangerous in another.

Meanings and effects, therefore, do not reside intrinsically in technologies but emerge within sociocultural and material–discursive configurations. Building on this argument, the keynote asks how we can move beyond functionalist as well as technologically optimistic or pessimistic perspectives. It discusses how critical-reflexive educational processes might enable us to examine the norms embodied in digital technologies, reflect on their unequal and situated implications, and imagine alternative relations between technologies, bodies, and participation.

References

Höger, B. (2024). #fitspiration: Körperideale und -devianzen in sportbezogenen sozialen Medien. In T. Bindel, F. Ott, H. Rudi, & C. Theis (Eds.), Schulsport in der Jugendphase (pp. 357–375). Meyer & Meyer Verlag.

Höger, B., & Meier, S. (2025). Exploring Marginalized Perspectives: Participatory Research in Physical Education With Students With Blindness and Visual Impairment. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 44(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2023-0325

Höger, B., Sandbichler, B., Weiß, K., Giese, M., & Meier, S. (submitted). “Stay on the ball”: Negotiating meanings of digital assistive technologies in Physical Education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly.

Meier, S., Höger, B., & Giese, M. (2023). “If only balls could talk…”: Barriers and opportunities to participation for students with blindness and visual impairment in specialized PE. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1286909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1286909

Related

  1. Combination of Technologies in Body Contouring: Evidence Mapping and a Decision-Making Algorithm
    Igo Reichmann Losso, Luiz Augusto Sousa Oliveira, Camila Araújo Gomes +5
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Exploring the Meaning-Making of Emergency Cesarean Surgery From the Maternal Perspective
    Haifa Eid, Hala Ahmed Bawadi, Marwa Nayef Alhalabi
    The Journal of Perinatal EducationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  3. Understanding digital diffusion and online decision-making in public health promotion: a sequential mixed-methods study of the violence prevention charter in Canada
    Shannon Turner
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Cardiac Computed Tomography in Infective Endocarditis: A Radiological Perspective on Structural Complications and Emerging Diagnostic Technologies.
    Loredana Elisabeta Popa, Bianca Boca, Dragoș Tudor Jula +7
    Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Use of digital technologies to deliver supportive care to adolescents and young adults following treatment for cancer
    Samantha C. Sodergren, Nicole Collaço
    Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative CarePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
BibTeX
@article{hoger2026making,
  title = {{Making sense of digital technologies: A sociocultural perspective from sport pedagogy}},
  author = {Brigitta Höger},
  journal = {Current Issues in Sport Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.36950/2026.5ciss058},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.36950/2026.5ciss058},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Making sense of digital technologies: A sociocultural perspective from sport pedagogy
AU  - Brigitta Höger
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Current Issues in Sport Science
DO  - 10.36950/2026.5ciss058
UR  - https://doi.org/10.36950/2026.5ciss058
AB  - Digitalization in sports is often discussed in terms of opportunities or risks associated with particular technologies. From a sociocultural perspective, however, digital technologies appear as profoundly ambivalent artefacts whose significance cannot be determined solely by assessing their functionality or classifying their effects. Instead, technologies are embedded in ongoing processes through which people make sense of themselves, others, and the world, while negotiating normative understandings of bodies, health, ability, or participation in sports.  Drawing on studies of health- and fitness-related social media content on Instagram (Höger, 2024) and digital assistive technologies (DATs) for blind and visually impaired (BVI) students in physical education (Höger et al., submitted; Höger & Meier, 2025; Meier et al., 2023), this keynote examines two interrelated dimensions of these processes. First, it explores how hegemonic understandings of bodies, health, and ability become embedded in digital representations, technological imaginaries, and material arrangements. On Instagram, young, slim, fit, and non-disabled bodies function as implicit standards against which other bodies are classified as desirable, normal, or in need of intervention. Fitness thereby becomes closely associated with discipline, responsibility, and self-management. In ball games involving BVI students, standardized rules, spatial arrangements, and sporting materials similarly establish apparently self-evident prerequisites for legitimate participation. DATs do not necessarily unsettle these requirements, but instead relocate the responsibility for fulfilling them from bodies to technologies imagined as adaptive, anticipatory, and infallible.  Second, the keynote demonstrates that young people do not simply adopt these meanings. They negotiate, appropriate, and sometimes resist them in situated and embodied ways. Their engagements with social media images reveal ambivalent positionings between critical distance from normative body ideals and their continuing affective appeal. Likewise, the meanings assigned to DATs shift across different situations of play. What enables participation in one situation may become distracting, restrictive, or dangerous in another.  Meanings and effects, therefore, do not reside intrinsically in technologies but emerge within sociocultural and material–discursive configurations. Building on this argument, the keynote asks how we can move beyond functionalist as well as technologically optimistic or pessimistic perspectives. It discusses how critical-reflexive educational processes might enable us to examine the norms embodied in digital technologies, reflect on their unequal and situated implications, and imagine alternative relations between technologies, bodies, and participation.  References  Höger, B. (2024). #fitspiration: Körperideale und -devianzen in sportbezogenen sozialen Medien. In T. Bindel, F. Ott, H. Rudi, & C. Theis (Eds.), Schulsport in der Jugendphase (pp. 357–375). Meyer & Meyer Verlag.  Höger, B., & Meier, S. (2025). Exploring Marginalized Perspectives: Participatory Research in Physical Education With Students With Blindness and Visual Impairment. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 44(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2023-0325  Höger, B., Sandbichler, B., Weiß, K., Giese, M., & Meier, S. (submitted). “Stay on the ball”: Negotiating meanings of digital assistive technologies in Physical Education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly.  Meier, S., Höger, B., & Giese, M. (2023). “If only balls could talk…”: Barriers and opportunities to participation for students with blindness and visual impairment in specialized PE. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1286909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1286909
SN  - 2414-6641
ER  -