Reducing Cranial Morphology Error in F3 Scalp Localization: Comparison of Heuristic and Regression‐Based Methods
- 1Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya—Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain
- 2Department of Mechanical Engineering Universitat Rovira i Virgili Tarragona Spain
- 3Department of Clinical Neurophisiology and Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, NeuroÈpia Southern Catalonia Biomedical Research Institute – IRB CatSud Reus Spain
Abstract
Purpose Accurate localization of the F3 scalp position is essential for targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), particularly when neuronavigation is unavailable. However, simplified scalp‐based heuristic methods may lead to clinically relevant targeting errors due to substantial interindividual variability in cranial morphology. In this context, this study evaluates the geometric accuracy of commonly used and newly proposed scalp‐based approaches for localizing the F3 position within the International 10–20 system. Specifically, it examines the impact of cranial morphological variability on localization error and assesses whether individualized regression‐based methods can improve targeting accuracy compared to traditional heuristic techniques. Method The intrinsic geometric accuracy of five F3 localization methods was systematically compared: BeamF3, Adjusted BeamF3, the Scalp Geometry‐based Parameter (SGP) method, NeurallyF3, and a newly developed approach EPlacementF3. A total of 250 anatomically realistic and morphologically diverse 3D head models (125 female, 125 male), generated using the HumanShape platform, were analyzed. Localization error was quantified as the Euclidean distance between each estimated F3 position and the reference coordinate defined by the International 10–20 system. Findings BeamF3 and Adjusted BeamF3 showed the highest localization errors (mean >5.5 mm and >8 mm, respectively), while the SGP method improved accuracy (≈2.4 mm). In contrast, NeurallyF3 and EPlacementF3 achieved submillimetric errors across sexes. EPlacementF3 demonstrated the best overall performance, with the lowest mean error (∼0.2 mm) and consistent results in the independent validation dataset. These findings highlight the strong influence of cranial morphology on heuristic methods and the superior robustness of individualized regression‐based approaches. Conclusion Commonly used heuristic methods do not reliably recover the true F3 position across heterogeneous cranial morphologies. In contrast, individualized regression‐based approaches substantially reduce morphology‐related error, supporting more accurate and scalable MRI‐free targeting for rTMS and other non‐invasive brain stimulation applications.
Related
- Comparison of the efficacy of pentazocine and tramadol for reducing emergence agitation in children after general anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.
- Comparison of Pulmonary Nodule Morphology on Pre-Contrast and Delayed Post-Contrast Stack-of-Spirals Ultrashort Echo Time MRI.
- Is linear regression sufficient for normative psychological assessment? A comparison between OLS, GAM, and GAMLSS across seven public reference datasets
- Heuristic optimization of AI agents for Dhumbal
- Multi-objective student nurse allocation problem during training using exact and hybrid heuristic–metaheuristic methods
BibTeX
@article{pamiesvila2026reducing,
title = {{Reducing Cranial Morphology Error in F3 Scalp Localization: Comparison of Heuristic and Regression‐Based Methods}},
author = {Rosa Pàmies‐Vilà and Laia Mallol‐Bordas and Vicenç Pascual‐Rubio and Albert Fabregat‐Sanjuan},
journal = {Brain and Behavior},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/brb3.71805},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71805},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Reducing Cranial Morphology Error in F3 Scalp Localization: Comparison of Heuristic and Regression‐Based Methods
AU - Rosa Pàmies‐Vilà
AU - Laia Mallol‐Bordas
AU - Vicenç Pascual‐Rubio
AU - Albert Fabregat‐Sanjuan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Brain and Behavior
DO - 10.1002/brb3.71805
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71805
AB - Purpose Accurate localization of the F3 scalp position is essential for targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), particularly when neuronavigation is unavailable. However, simplified scalp‐based heuristic methods may lead to clinically relevant targeting errors due to substantial interindividual variability in cranial morphology. In this context, this study evaluates the geometric accuracy of commonly used and newly proposed scalp‐based approaches for localizing the F3 position within the International 10–20 system. Specifically, it examines the impact of cranial morphological variability on localization error and assesses whether individualized regression‐based methods can improve targeting accuracy compared to traditional heuristic techniques. Method The intrinsic geometric accuracy of five F3 localization methods was systematically compared: BeamF3, Adjusted BeamF3, the Scalp Geometry‐based Parameter (SGP) method, NeurallyF3, and a newly developed approach EPlacementF3. A total of 250 anatomically realistic and morphologically diverse 3D head models (125 female, 125 male), generated using the HumanShape platform, were analyzed. Localization error was quantified as the Euclidean distance between each estimated F3 position and the reference coordinate defined by the International 10–20 system. Findings BeamF3 and Adjusted BeamF3 showed the highest localization errors (mean >5.5 mm and >8 mm, respectively), while the SGP method improved accuracy (≈2.4 mm). In contrast, NeurallyF3 and EPlacementF3 achieved submillimetric errors across sexes. EPlacementF3 demonstrated the best overall performance, with the lowest mean error (∼0.2 mm) and consistent results in the independent validation dataset. These findings highlight the strong influence of cranial morphology on heuristic methods and the superior robustness of individualized regression‐based approaches. Conclusion Commonly used heuristic methods do not reliably recover the true F3 position across heterogeneous cranial morphologies. In contrast, individualized regression‐based approaches substantially reduce morphology‐related error, supporting more accurate and scalable MRI‐free targeting for rTMS and other non‐invasive brain stimulation applications.
SN - 2162-3279
ER -