Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Redundant Records of the Past: Unifying Quantum Darwinism and Decoherent Histories

Abstract

There exist two different paradigms for records in isolated quantum systems: decoherent histories (which determines which past events leave formal records) and quantum Darwinism (which determines which current events get redundantly recorded). Neither one implies the other, and connections between the two are scarcely investigated. We unify quantum Darwinism and decoherent histories based on the insight that only redundant records about past events matter. The resulting framework of past redundancy encompasses quantum Darwinism when applied to events at the current time, and it implies the probability sum rule or decoherence of histories. The Bhattacharyya coefficient (or fidelity) plays an important role to establish this connection. Importantly, various examples show that past redundancy is a more widespread phenomenon than the fine-tuned models necessary for quantum Darwinism suggest. We thus arrive at a richer picture in which redundancy can be caused by mechanisms different from quantum Darwinism (such as macroevents or cascade structures), which emphasizes that redundancy is necessary but not sufficient for objectivity, and which, overall, allows to realistically investigate the question: how generic is redundancy in nature?

Related

  1. Environment Alignment and Redundant Record Formation in Imperfect-CNOT Quantum Darwinism
    Aleksander Lasek, Paweł Horodecki
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. From Auditability to Redundant Records: Public Finality in a Consistency-Constrained Information History
    Tomoyuki Uchida
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)PreprintCC BY14 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsOpenAlex
  3. Quantum Darwinism through apparatus-mediated environmental recording
    Tran P. H Don, Lan Nguyen Tran, Le Bin Ho
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Atoms that Matter: Largest Materials Datasets Are 99% Redundant, and Local Chemistry Can Guide the Required 1%
    Evgeny Moerman, Igor Poltavsky, Anton Charkin-Gorbulin +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Superposition of dynamics, indefinite causal order, and quantum histories
    Charis Anastopoulos, Ntina Savvidou
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGravitation & general relativityQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{strasberg2026redundant,
  title = {{Redundant Records of the Past: Unifying Quantum Darwinism and Decoherent Histories}},
  author = {Philipp Strasberg},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.09845},
  eprint = {2610.09845},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09845},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Redundant Records of the Past: Unifying Quantum Darwinism and Decoherent Histories
AU  - Philipp Strasberg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.09845
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09845
AB  - There exist two different paradigms for records in isolated quantum systems: decoherent histories (which determines which past events leave formal records) and quantum Darwinism (which determines which current events get redundantly recorded). Neither one implies the other, and connections between the two are scarcely investigated. We unify quantum Darwinism and decoherent histories based on the insight that only redundant records about past events matter. The resulting framework of past redundancy encompasses quantum Darwinism when applied to events at the current time, and it implies the probability sum rule or decoherence of histories. The Bhattacharyya coefficient (or fidelity) plays an important role to establish this connection. Importantly, various examples show that past redundancy is a more widespread phenomenon than the fine-tuned models necessary for quantum Darwinism suggest. We thus arrive at a richer picture in which redundancy can be caused by mechanisms different from quantum Darwinism (such as macroevents or cascade structures), which emphasizes that redundancy is necessary but not sufficient for objectivity, and which, overall, allows to realistically investigate the question: how generic is redundancy in nature?
ER  -