Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Locality-Preparation Time Tradeoffs in Dissipative Quantum Systems

Abstract

Dissipative state preparation engineers quantum many-body states as steady states of an open-system dynamics. The spatial range of the required dissipation sets both the feasibility of analog implementations and the connectivity and control complexity of digital ones. Yet how this locality quantitatively constrains preparation times remains largely unknown. Here, we establish an exact locality-preparation time relation for quadratic fermionic systems and develop a construction that optimizes the locality of the dissipative dynamics while preserving the target state. Applied to the Kitaev chain, our framework reveals sharply different locality-preparation time tradeoffs in critical and gapped regimes. At criticality, suppressing the algebraic tails of the jump operators necessarily forces the preparation time to grow algebraically with system size. By contrast, both trivial and topological gapped phases admit exponentially localized dissipation with a finite preparation time in the thermodynamic limit. Our results identify when fast dissipative preparation is compatible with local control and when criticality imposes an unavoidable dynamical cost.

Related

  1. Locality in Dissipative Ground-State Preparation
    Qicheng Tang, Ruhanshi Barad, Xueda Wen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Locality and filter design for dissipative ground-state preparation
    Samuel J. Elman
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. The Gated Quantum Resonator: a reduced-representation Hamiltonian–network framework for gated driven–dissipative quantum systems
    James R F SUTTON
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsChemRxiv
  4. Digital Twin Modeling of Quantum Dynamical Systems: Dissipative Quantum Reservoir Computing
    Abhijit Sen, Bikram Keshari Parida, Shital Chauhan +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Asymptotic Pseudospectra in Dissipative Floquet Quantum Systems: Geometric Structures and Observable Dynamics
    Yuncheng Xie, Haozhe Shi, Zhuocheng Ma +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{westhoff2026localitypreparation,
  title = {{Locality-Preparation Time Tradeoffs in Dissipative Quantum Systems}},
  author = {Philipp Westhoff and Sara Murciano and Mattia Moroder},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.13784},
  eprint = {2610.13784},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13784},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Locality-Preparation Time Tradeoffs in Dissipative Quantum Systems
AU  - Philipp Westhoff
AU  - Sara Murciano
AU  - Mattia Moroder
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.13784
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13784
AB  - Dissipative state preparation engineers quantum many-body states as steady states of an open-system dynamics. The spatial range of the required dissipation sets both the feasibility of analog implementations and the connectivity and control complexity of digital ones. Yet how this locality quantitatively constrains preparation times remains largely unknown. Here, we establish an exact locality-preparation time relation for quadratic fermionic systems and develop a construction that optimizes the locality of the dissipative dynamics while preserving the target state. Applied to the Kitaev chain, our framework reveals sharply different locality-preparation time tradeoffs in critical and gapped regimes. At criticality, suppressing the algebraic tails of the jump operators necessarily forces the preparation time to grow algebraically with system size. By contrast, both trivial and topological gapped phases admit exponentially localized dissipation with a finite preparation time in the thermodynamic limit. Our results identify when fast dissipative preparation is compatible with local control and when criticality imposes an unavoidable dynamical cost.
ER  -