Digital range of motion analysis is sensitive to subjective steps in joint model construction
- 1School of Biological and Environmental Sciences Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool UK
Abstract
Reconstructing locomotion and behaviour in extinct vertebrates requires a detailed understanding of joint mobility to constrain the range of potential limb orientations to more biologically plausible poses. Joint mobility is typically assessed using range of motion (ROM) analysis, which is increasingly implemented within digital workflows. Digital ROM analysis requires the positioning of bones in three‐dimensional space into a starting pose that enables systematic sampling of rotational and translational configurations (e.g. reference pose). However, this initial process involves subjective steps, particularly in selecting articular surfaces and defining a joint centre of rotation. No thorough sensitivity analysis has yet been published. In this study, we have conducted systematic sensitivity analyses of a complete six degree‐of‐freedom automated ROM analysis workflow to evaluate how variation at each stage of the reference pose assembly, stemming from both input data and user decision, affects the determined viable poses in the ankle and tarsometatarsophalangeal III joints of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Our results reveal that ROM analysis outputs are sensitive to variation in reference pose assembly, especially changes in articular surface selection and the primitive used to define the joint centre. This sensitivity may be unlikely to directly affect the overall conclusions of any given individual study, particularly when using maximum viable rotations to constrain biomechanical models. However, it potentially makes comparison between studies and taxa problematic, and we therefore advocate that future ROM studies should prioritise providing complete joint models as supplemental data to enable replicability.
Related
- Digital Twins in Mental Health Care: A Qualitative Study on Subjective Relevance, Acceptability and Implementation Considerations Co-Designed, Co-Produced and Co-Written with Experts by Experience and Academics
- Sensitive reverse transcription-digital droplet PCR-based discrimination of hepatitis delta virus RNAs reveals differential effects of interferon-α on viral RNA species
- Development of Sensitive Droplet Digital PCR Assays for Detecting Urinary TERT Promoter Mutations as Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Detection of Urothelial Cancer
- Neural representation of the subjective uncertainty of prediction in the human brain
- Do You Ever Get Tired of Being Wrong? The Unique Impact of Feedback on Subjective Experiences of Effort
BibTeX
@article{lowes2026digital,
title = {{Digital range of motion analysis is sensitive to subjective steps in joint model construction}},
author = {R. J. Lowes and A. Jannel and B. W. Griffin and T. L. Prescott and P. L. Falkingham},
journal = {Journal of Anatomy},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1111/joa.70179},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.70179},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Digital range of motion analysis is sensitive to subjective steps in joint model construction
AU - R. J. Lowes
AU - A. Jannel
AU - B. W. Griffin
AU - T. L. Prescott
AU - P. L. Falkingham
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/03
JO - Journal of Anatomy
DO - 10.1111/joa.70179
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.70179
AB - Reconstructing locomotion and behaviour in extinct vertebrates requires a detailed understanding of joint mobility to constrain the range of potential limb orientations to more biologically plausible poses. Joint mobility is typically assessed using range of motion (ROM) analysis, which is increasingly implemented within digital workflows. Digital ROM analysis requires the positioning of bones in three‐dimensional space into a starting pose that enables systematic sampling of rotational and translational configurations (e.g. reference pose). However, this initial process involves subjective steps, particularly in selecting articular surfaces and defining a joint centre of rotation. No thorough sensitivity analysis has yet been published. In this study, we have conducted systematic sensitivity analyses of a complete six degree‐of‐freedom automated ROM analysis workflow to evaluate how variation at each stage of the reference pose assembly, stemming from both input data and user decision, affects the determined viable poses in the ankle and tarsometatarsophalangeal III joints of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Our results reveal that ROM analysis outputs are sensitive to variation in reference pose assembly, especially changes in articular surface selection and the primitive used to define the joint centre. This sensitivity may be unlikely to directly affect the overall conclusions of any given individual study, particularly when using maximum viable rotations to constrain biomechanical models. However, it potentially makes comparison between studies and taxa problematic, and we therefore advocate that future ROM studies should prioritise providing complete joint models as supplemental data to enable replicability.
SN - 0021-8782
SN - 1469-7580
ER -