Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BYPlants (Basel, Switzerland)

When Roads Remove Trees, Conservation Must Move Fast: A Rescue Translocation Model for Keralam’s Native Epiphytic Orchids

  1. 1KSCSTE-Malabar Botanical Garden and Institute for Plant Sciences, Kozhikode 673014, Keralam, India; (M.V.); (P.N.S.)
  2. 2, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK

Abstract

Development-related tree removal can immediately eliminate epiphytic orchids and specialised canopy habitats, yet evidence for rescue translocation remains limited. We assessed 27,324 mature native orchids representing 21 species, rescued during road widening in Keralam, India, and translocated to three contrasting recipient landscapes. Of the 27,324 translocated orchids, 19,511 survived (71.4%) after 12–24 months. Among the surviving plants, 5224 flowered (26.8%), of which 1934 produced capsules (37.0%). Recovery differed among recipient sites, orchid species and phorophytes. The buffered urban site supported the highest survival, whereas the exposed coastal site imposed a strong establishment filter but supported relatively high flowering and capsule production among survivors. Regional endemic and cool-growing orchids also survived and reproduced, although establishment was lower and more site-dependent. Phorophyte identity was most strongly associated with establishment, while root growth consistently predicted survival, flowering and capsule production. Embryo-containing seeds occurred in all sampled capsule collections, but formal physiological viability and germination tests were not undertaken. Rescue translocation can therefore reduce otherwise likely losses when tree removal is unavoidable. The findings support pre-felling surveys, timely rescue, recipient site screening, testing across candidate phorophytes and staged long-term monitoring, while the operational allocation design prevents causal attribution or prescriptive species–phorophyte matching.

Related

  1. Orchids from Rio Grande Do Sul, Southern Brazil: What We Know and What We Still Have to Know to Ensure Their Conservation
    Rodrigo B. Singer, Nelson Barbosa Machado Neto, Wendy Carolay Navarro Romo +3
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  2. Epiphytic cryptogam communities differ little despite strong variation in coastal fog exposure
    Abbey Schedler, Katrina McCollough, Frey Rogers +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPlant biologybioRxivPMC
  3. Ferns on ferns: gametophyte assemblages on tree ferns reveal associations with accidentally epiphytic ferns
    Alexandria Quinlan, Li-Yaung Kuo, Jer-Ming Hu +1
    Annals of BotanyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEcologyPMC
  4. Floral Volatile Organic Compounds of Chinese Cymbidium Orchids: From Biosynthesis and Function to Genetic Regulation
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  5. The reproductive multiverse of diandrous orchids: two anthers offer new perspectives on the role of floral traits
    João C F Cardoso, Paulo E Oliveira, Zong-Xin Ren +1
    Annals of BotanyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEcologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{venugopal2026when,
  title = {{When Roads Remove Trees, Conservation Must Move Fast: A Rescue Translocation Model for Keralam’s Native Epiphytic Orchids}},
  author = {Mithun Venugopal and Pradeep N. Sukumaran and Viswambharan Sarasan},
  journal = {Plants (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/plants15203153},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13709079},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - When Roads Remove Trees, Conservation Must Move Fast: A Rescue Translocation Model for Keralam’s Native Epiphytic Orchids
AU  - Mithun Venugopal
AU  - Pradeep N. Sukumaran
AU  - Viswambharan Sarasan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/plants15203153
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13709079
AB  - Development-related tree removal can immediately eliminate epiphytic orchids and specialised canopy habitats, yet evidence for rescue translocation remains limited. We assessed 27,324 mature native orchids representing 21 species, rescued during road widening in Keralam, India, and translocated to three contrasting recipient landscapes. Of the 27,324 translocated orchids, 19,511 survived (71.4%) after 12–24 months. Among the surviving plants, 5224 flowered (26.8%), of which 1934 produced capsules (37.0%). Recovery differed among recipient sites, orchid species and phorophytes. The buffered urban site supported the highest survival, whereas the exposed coastal site imposed a strong establishment filter but supported relatively high flowering and capsule production among survivors. Regional endemic and cool-growing orchids also survived and reproduced, although establishment was lower and more site-dependent. Phorophyte identity was most strongly associated with establishment, while root growth consistently predicted survival, flowering and capsule production. Embryo-containing seeds occurred in all sampled capsule collections, but formal physiological viability and germination tests were not undertaken. Rescue translocation can therefore reduce otherwise likely losses when tree removal is unavoidable. The findings support pre-felling surveys, timely rescue, recipient site screening, testing across candidate phorophytes and staged long-term monitoring, while the operational allocation design prevents causal attribution or prescriptive species–phorophyte matching.
SN  - 2223-7747
ER  -