Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC oral health

Artifacts of orthodontic materials on cone beam computed tomography images.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye.
  2. 2Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye. [email protected].
  3. 3Department of Oral, Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye.
  4. 4Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare the artifact expression of various materials used in orthodontic treatment on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. It was hypothesized that three-dimensional (3D) printing resins and polyetheretherketone (PEEK), owing to their relatively low density and low effective atomic number, would generate fewer artifacts than conventional materials.Methods

Ten orthodontic materials and an empty phantom control (Temporary CB, Permanent Crown, Biomed Clear, Glass Ionomer Cement, Composite, Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement, PEEK, Titanium Grade 2, Stainless Steel, and Monolithic Zirconia) were placed in a phantom model and scanned using the Planmeca ProMax 3D system. Each material was scanned three times, and grayscale standard deviation was measured in eight peripheral regions of interest (ROIs) per scan. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn-Bonferroni pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05), supplemented by scan-level and mixed-effects sensitivity analyses to account for the non-independence of ROIs within the same scan.Results

A statistically significant difference in artifact expression was observed among the materials (P < 0.001). The lowest artifact expression was found in Biomed Clear (BC) and PEEK, whereas the highest artifact expression was observed in stainless steel (SS). Both PEEK and BC produced significantly fewer artifacts than many conventional materials. The scan-level and mixed-effects sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the primary findings.Conclusions

BC and PEEK materials produced significantly lower artifact expression than conventional metallic and ceramic materials in CBCT imaging, potentially contributing to improved image quality. However, the present study evaluated grayscale standard deviation only; further studies assessing diagnostic performance (e.g., sensitivity/specificity) are required to determine whether the observed reduction in artifact expression translates into improved clinical diagnostic accuracy.

Related

  1. Evaluation of adenosine-induced splenic switch-off in Tc-99m tetrofosmin (Myoview) myocardial perfusion studies as marker of stress adequacy by semiquantitative analysis of acquired single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images
    Noor F. AlKandari, Maryam M. Bouzabar, Danah A. AlDhafiri +3
    Nuclear Medicine CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyPMC
  2. Normal values of femoral head coverage angles on three-dimensional computed tomography images
    Seohyun Choi, Seon Min Lee, Young Jae Kim +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyPhysiologyPLOS
  3. Quantitative comparison of virtual non-contrast and true non-contrast computed tomography pulmonary angiography images across eight thoracic tissue types: A retrospective cross-sectional study
    Jiulong Yan, Ziyu Zhao, Xin Zhou +5
    The Journal of International Medical ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. From coronary computed tomography angiography to the cath lab: computed tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention of a high-risk left anterior descending artery lesion
    Natalia Krajewska, Łukasz Kołtowski
    Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  5. ECG-image-database: large-scale paired ECG images and time-series with real-world artifacts; a foundation for computerized ECG digitization and analysis
    Matthew A. Reyna, Deepanshi Deepanshi, James Tyler Weigle +14
    Physiological MeasurementPeer-reviewedCC BY34 citedCardiovascular medicineOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{guller2026artifacts,
  title = {{Artifacts of orthodontic materials on cone beam computed tomography images.}},
  author = {Mustafa Taha Guller and Yavuz Selim Genç and Muhammed Enes Naralan and Alper Ozdogan},
  journal = {BMC oral health},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12903-026-09387-z},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897515},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Artifacts of orthodontic materials on cone beam computed tomography images.
AU  - Mustafa Taha Guller
AU  - Yavuz Selim Genç
AU  - Muhammed Enes Naralan
AU  - Alper Ozdogan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC oral health
DO  - 10.1186/s12903-026-09387-z
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897515
AB  - Background  This study aimed to compare the artifact expression of various materials used in orthodontic treatment on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. It was hypothesized that three-dimensional (3D) printing resins and polyetheretherketone (PEEK), owing to their relatively low density and low effective atomic number, would generate fewer artifacts than conventional materials.Methods  Ten orthodontic materials and an empty phantom control (Temporary CB, Permanent Crown, Biomed Clear, Glass Ionomer Cement, Composite, Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement, PEEK, Titanium Grade 2, Stainless Steel, and Monolithic Zirconia) were placed in a phantom model and scanned using the Planmeca ProMax 3D system. Each material was scanned three times, and grayscale standard deviation was measured in eight peripheral regions of interest (ROIs) per scan. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn-Bonferroni pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05), supplemented by scan-level and mixed-effects sensitivity analyses to account for the non-independence of ROIs within the same scan.Results  A statistically significant difference in artifact expression was observed among the materials (P < 0.001). The lowest artifact expression was found in Biomed Clear (BC) and PEEK, whereas the highest artifact expression was observed in stainless steel (SS). Both PEEK and BC produced significantly fewer artifacts than many conventional materials. The scan-level and mixed-effects sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the primary findings.Conclusions  BC and PEEK materials produced significantly lower artifact expression than conventional metallic and ceramic materials in CBCT imaging, potentially contributing to improved image quality. However, the present study evaluated grayscale standard deviation only; further studies assessing diagnostic performance (e.g., sensitivity/specificity) are required to determine whether the observed reduction in artifact expression translates into improved clinical diagnostic accuracy.
SN  - 1472-6831
ER  -