AerialStamp: dating aerial orthophotos from visual cues and Sentinel-2 time series
Abstract
Aerial imagery from drones and airplanes is increasingly used as reference data for satellite remote sensing. Linking an orthophoto to the satellite observations of the same time requires its acquisition date. In crowd-sourced aerial archives, this reported acquisition date can be incorrect or incomplete. Yet no method exists to verify or estimate it from the data. Here, we develop AerialStamp, a method that estimates the acquisition date of an aerial orthophoto, from a drone or an aircraft, as a calibrated probability distribution over the days of the flight year. The model combines DINOv2 embeddings of 10 cm patches of the orthophoto with the Sentinel-2 time series of the site. For every week of that series, spatial correlation features describe how well the orthophoto, averaged to 10 m, correlates across pixels with the Sentinel-2 image of that week. We used 6,984 publicly available orthophotos from 129 countries in the crowd-sourced database deadtrees.earth. Spatial block cross-validation yields a median absolute error of 18.5 days (mean 30.3 days), where for 7% of orthophotos the estimated and submitted dates differed by more than 90 days. Within the dataset of crowd-sourced aerial images, at least 1.3% of the acquisition dates were detected to be wrong. A further 10.3% fall on the 1st or 15th of a month, days that are submitted about 1.6 times as often as expected by chance and therefore likely serve as placeholders. The resulting framework is available as a Python package (github.com/cmosig/aerialstamp) and is being integrated into the platform deadtrees.earth.
Related
- Direct dating of 3.5 Ga biogenic carbon in a microbial mat remnant, Singhbhum Craton, India
- Measuring atmospheric microplastic composition and occurrence from an uncrewed aerial system
- High-resolution 3D turbulence measurements with different quadcopter uncrewed aerial systems: verification and validation for single- and multi-vehicle measurements
- Phototrophy improves the aerial fitness in a photoheterotrophic Methylobacterium isolated from clouds
- Brief communication: Rb-Sr dating and provenance of ice-drafted dropstones from the mid-Atlantic ridge at mid-latitudes (36°12’N; 33°53’W)
BibTeX
@misc{mosig2026aerialstamp,
title = {{AerialStamp: dating aerial orthophotos from visual cues and Sentinel-2 time series}},
author = {Clemens Mosig and David Montero Loaiza and Miguel Mahecha and Janusch Vajna-Jehle and Teja Kattenborn},
howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31223/x5sz4q},
url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15721/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - AerialStamp: dating aerial orthophotos from visual cues and Sentinel-2 time series
AU - Clemens Mosig
AU - David Montero Loaiza
AU - Miguel Mahecha
AU - Janusch Vajna-Jehle
AU - Teja Kattenborn
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
PB - EarthArXiv
DO - 10.31223/x5sz4q
UR - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15721/
AB - Aerial imagery from drones and airplanes is increasingly used as reference data for satellite remote sensing. Linking an orthophoto to the satellite observations of the same time requires its acquisition date. In crowd-sourced aerial archives, this reported acquisition date can be incorrect or incomplete. Yet no method exists to verify or estimate it from the data. Here, we develop AerialStamp, a method that estimates the acquisition date of an aerial orthophoto, from a drone or an aircraft, as a calibrated probability distribution over the days of the flight year. The model combines DINOv2 embeddings of 10 cm patches of the orthophoto with the Sentinel-2 time series of the site. For every week of that series, spatial correlation features describe how well the orthophoto, averaged to 10 m, correlates across pixels with the Sentinel-2 image of that week. We used 6,984 publicly available orthophotos from 129 countries in the crowd-sourced database deadtrees.earth. Spatial block cross-validation yields a median absolute error of 18.5 days (mean 30.3 days), where for 7% of orthophotos the estimated and submitted dates differed by more than 90 days. Within the dataset of crowd-sourced aerial images, at least 1.3% of the acquisition dates were detected to be wrong. A further 10.3% fall on the 1st or 15th of a month, days that are submitted about 1.6 times as often as expected by chance and therefore likely serve as placeholders. The resulting framework is available as a Python package (github.com/cmosig/aerialstamp) and is being integrated into the platform deadtrees.earth.
ER -