Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Preservation and storage effects on river sediment microbiomes: Implications for community stability and ecological inference

  1. 1Department of Environmental Science (ACES), Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Sample preservation and storage can alter microbial communities between sampling and analysis, influencing the interpretation of environmental microbiome data. We investigated how preservation method, storage temperature, and storage duration affect river sediment microbiomes using 16S and 18S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Sediments were preserved in ethanol, nucleic acid preservation (NAP) buffer, or without a preservative, and stored at room temperature or frozen at -20 degrees Celsius or -80 degrees Celsius for up to eight weeks. We report that preservation method, storage conditions, and their interaction influenced estimates of microbial diversity and community composition. Differences between treatments were detectable after approximately 18 h and generally increased with storage time. Frozen samples remained closest to their treatment-specific baseline communities, whereas room-temperature storage, particularly without a preservative, produced the largest changes. Notably, ethanol and NAP buffer preservation reduced, but did not prevent, changes during room-temperature storage. Preservation also influenced taxonomic patterns and the outcome of phylogenetic null-model analyses. Frozen storage generally retained the sample's assembly-metric estimates, with stronger signatures of deterministic community assembly, whereas room-temperature storage shifted the inferred balance toward stochastic processes. Our results show that preservation and storage conditions can affect both the microbial community measured and the ecological conclusions drawn from it. Among the conditions tested, frozen storage provided the best preservation of sediment microbial communities and should be preferred when samples cannot be processed immediately.

Related

  1. Virus-mediated prokaryotic community adaptation dynamics under thermal stress in municipal organic solid waste microbiomes
    Xinyue Kang, Pinjing He, Hua Zhang +1
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyDOAJ
  2. Correlated traits generate the structure and stability of multiplex ecological networks
    K. R. S. Hale, E. Thebault, F. S. Valdovinos
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEcologybioRxiv
  3. Heterogeneity among and competition between life stages together extend the stability boundary of complex ecological communities
    Grace Garmire, James P. O'Dwyer
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textEvolutionary biologyarXiv
  4. An Analysis of Outdoor Recreation on Land Slated for Development; Implications for a Social-Ecological System in Boulder, Colorado
    Clare Gallagher, Cassandra Brooks
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEcoEvoRxiv
  5. Ecological stability masks rapid, convergent evolution within the honey bee worker microbiome
    C. R. P. Robinson, I. L. G. Newton, A. G. Dolezal
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{serrana2026preservation,
  title = {{Preservation and storage effects on river sediment microbiomes: Implications for community stability and ecological inference}},
  author = {J. Serrana and M. Posselt},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.05.749588},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.05.749588v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Preservation and storage effects on river sediment microbiomes: Implications for community stability and ecological inference
AU  - J. Serrana
AU  - M. Posselt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/05
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.05.749588
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.05.749588v1
AB  - Sample preservation and storage can alter microbial communities between sampling and analysis, influencing the interpretation of environmental microbiome data. We investigated how preservation method, storage temperature, and storage duration affect river sediment microbiomes using 16S and 18S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Sediments were preserved in ethanol, nucleic acid preservation (NAP) buffer, or without a preservative, and stored at room temperature or frozen at -20 degrees Celsius or -80 degrees Celsius for up to eight weeks. We report that preservation method, storage conditions, and their interaction influenced estimates of microbial diversity and community composition. Differences between treatments were detectable after approximately 18 h and generally increased with storage time. Frozen samples remained closest to their treatment-specific baseline communities, whereas room-temperature storage, particularly without a preservative, produced the largest changes. Notably, ethanol and NAP buffer preservation reduced, but did not prevent, changes during room-temperature storage. Preservation also influenced taxonomic patterns and the outcome of phylogenetic null-model analyses. Frozen storage generally retained the sample's assembly-metric estimates, with stronger signatures of deterministic community assembly, whereas room-temperature storage shifted the inferred balance toward stochastic processes. Our results show that preservation and storage conditions can affect both the microbial community measured and the ecological conclusions drawn from it. Among the conditions tested, frozen storage provided the best preservation of sediment microbial communities and should be preferred when samples cannot be processed immediately.
ER  -