Breaking the methodological silos: Integrating Mixed-Methods in Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Lessons learnt from fieldwork in Tenerife
- 1Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Abstract
This essay explores the advantages and limitations of using mixed-methods approaches to improve local multi-hazard risk (MHR) assessment and its inherent complexities. By combining desktop analysis, field observations, questionnaires and stakeholder interviews, we demonstrate how each method complements each other to fill data gaps, improve design of methods such as surveys, and increase the understanding of multi-hazard risk dynamics and challenges that become apparent in a local context. Mixed-methods also allow for bridging the gap between scientific modelling and community realities, while reducing reliance on often limited datasets and standardised (often quantitative) methods that are often aimed at larger scale assessments. This combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is illustrated in a recent fieldwork experience, with the objective of suggesting Nature-based Solutions (NBS) to reduce climate risk for the island of Tenerife. In our research agenda, we emphasize the importance of planning ahead when implementing mixed-methods, interdisciplinary collaboration, understanding the feedback loops across methods and incorporating local knowledge to ensure that the adaptation strategies are both evidence-based and socially equitable. This iterative framework aims to enhance the understanding, feasibility and community acceptance of MHR adaptation strategies.
Related
- Integrating agrarian differentiation and labor mobility into TAPE-based assessments of agroecology. A methodological exploration in the Cambodian rice sector
- Beyond prediction accuracy by integrating GWAASB into wheat stability assessment across environments in Saudi Arabia
- Do Botanical Gardens Pose a Pollen Allergenicity Risk? A Multi-Method Assessment Integrating Species-Specific Values of Potential Allergenicity and Pollen Concentration Monitoring
- Benchmark indicators for evaluating sea turtle rehabilitation outcomes at a wildlife rehabilitation center on Tenerife island, Spain (1982–2025)
- A Dual-parameter 3D Assessment of Alveolar Cleft Bone Grafts: Integrating Bone Density and Modified Volumetry.
BibTeX
@article{alvarez2026breaking,
title = {{Breaking the methodological silos: Integrating Mixed-Methods in Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Lessons learnt from fieldwork in Tenerife}},
author = {Guillermo García Álvarez and Marleen C. de Ruiter},
journal = {PLOS Climate},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pclm.0001070},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0001070},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Breaking the methodological silos: Integrating Mixed-Methods in Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Lessons learnt from fieldwork in Tenerife
AU - Guillermo García Álvarez
AU - Marleen C. de Ruiter
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - PLOS Climate
DO - 10.1371/journal.pclm.0001070
UR - https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0001070
AB - This essay explores the advantages and limitations of using mixed-methods approaches to improve local multi-hazard risk (MHR) assessment and its inherent complexities. By combining desktop analysis, field observations, questionnaires and stakeholder interviews, we demonstrate how each method complements each other to fill data gaps, improve design of methods such as surveys, and increase the understanding of multi-hazard risk dynamics and challenges that become apparent in a local context. Mixed-methods also allow for bridging the gap between scientific modelling and community realities, while reducing reliance on often limited datasets and standardised (often quantitative) methods that are often aimed at larger scale assessments. This combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is illustrated in a recent fieldwork experience, with the objective of suggesting Nature-based Solutions (NBS) to reduce climate risk for the island of Tenerife. In our research agenda, we emphasize the importance of planning ahead when implementing mixed-methods, interdisciplinary collaboration, understanding the feedback loops across methods and incorporating local knowledge to ensure that the adaptation strategies are both evidence-based and socially equitable. This iterative framework aims to enhance the understanding, feasibility and community acceptance of MHR adaptation strategies.
SN - 2767-3200
ER -