Phase transitions through excited-state level crossings and topological indicators: the case of the XXZ chain with staggered Ising interaction
Abstract
We combine two ways of determining the phase diagram of the spin-1/2 XXZ chain with a staggered Ising interaction and uniform transverse exchange, based on exact diagonalization. The model realizes a competition between Néel order and bond-dimerized phases generated by the alternating Ising interaction. The simplest approach to determine the phase boundaries is to use topological indicators based on generalized position operators (GPOs). We show that in general, the bosonized and numerical results for the topological indicators agree. The second is the method of crossings of excited energy levels (MCEL), which is justified by conformal field theory. Despite the partial loss of translational symmetry induced by the alternating Ising interaction, we show that, with the aid of the GPO to identify the relevant level crossings, the MCEL provides an accurate determination of the phase boundary between the Néel and dimerized phases. While the jumps of a topological indicator based on a GPO provide a qualitatively correct phase diagram, its accuracy is affected when the gap is very small (or the correlation length very large) at one side of the transition, as we show using field-theoretical arguments. The combination of both methods provides a more efficient way of calculating phase diagrams for correlated one-dimensional models than other widely used conventional approaches.
Related
- Non-Hermitian quantum phase transitions in the XY model induced by staggered imaginary Dzyaloshinskii--Moriya interaction
- Quantum phase transitions and quantum-information characterization of a non-Hermitian XY chain with staggered Dzyaloshinskii--Moriya interactions
- Tunable non-Hermitian skin effect and topological phases in ladders with staggered nonreciprocal interleg hopping
- Persistent homology of Hamiltonian orbits with applications to beam physics: Euler-Betti classification and topological chaos indicators
- Logarithmic transport at topological phase transitions of one-dimensional chiral quantum systems
BibTeX
@misc{marquez2026phase,
title = {{Phase transitions through excited-state level crossings and topological indicators: the case of the XXZ chain with staggered Ising interaction}},
author = {B. F. Márquez and K. Hallberg and A. A. Aligia},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.02845},
eprint = {2606.02845},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02845},
note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Phase transitions through excited-state level crossings and topological indicators: the case of the XXZ chain with staggered Ising interaction
AU - B. F. Márquez
AU - K. Hallberg
AU - A. A. Aligia
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.02845
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02845
AB - We combine two ways of determining the phase diagram of the spin-1/2 XXZ chain with a staggered Ising interaction and uniform transverse exchange, based on exact diagonalization. The model realizes a competition between Néel order and bond-dimerized phases generated by the alternating Ising interaction. The simplest approach to determine the phase boundaries is to use topological indicators based on generalized position operators (GPOs). We show that in general, the bosonized and numerical results for the topological indicators agree. The second is the method of crossings of excited energy levels (MCEL), which is justified by conformal field theory. Despite the partial loss of translational symmetry induced by the alternating Ising interaction, we show that, with the aid of the GPO to identify the relevant level crossings, the MCEL provides an accurate determination of the phase boundary between the Néel and dimerized phases. While the jumps of a topological indicator based on a GPO provide a qualitatively correct phase diagram, its accuracy is affected when the gap is very small (or the correlation length very large) at one side of the transition, as we show using field-theoretical arguments. The combination of both methods provides a more efficient way of calculating phase diagrams for correlated one-dimensional models than other widely used conventional approaches.
ER -