Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Cluster Ages to Reconstruct the Milky Way Assembly (CARMA). VI. The age-metallicity relation of in-situ clusters and the age of the Universe

2 more authors

Abstract

Within the homogeneous framework for the derivation of GC ages defined by the CARMA collaboration, we focus on the clusters born in-situ in the MW. As they are the oldest among the old GCs, their absolute age provides constraints about the age of the Universe. Moreover, the shape of their AMR is expected to show the imprints of past merger events, in case these were able to trigger GC formation in the Galaxy. We derive new homogeneous ages for 18 GCs dynamically and/or chemically classified as in-situ, and build the MW AMR from a total sample of 34 GCs. We find that all the selected GCs follow a well defined AMR, with the exception of NGC6642 and Pal1. While the former is likely a member of the LKH merger event, thus putting chronological evidence for the existence of this progenitor on even more robust ground, for the latter we propose an alternative scenario according to which it formed in-situ, but in a metal-depleted region of the Galaxy, possibly due to the interaction with an unspecified merger event. To find evidence of merger-driven GC formation, we use a GMM for the observed age distribution. This is statistically best-fit by 4 components, which we associate with significant events of the MW merger history. Cluster ages were finally calibrated to a more accurate absolute age scale based on asteroseismic measurements of the mass of red giant stars in NGC6791, and the resulting AMR was fit to compute the look-back time for the beginning of cluster formation in the MW. The fit yields t_GC,i=13.59+0.33-0.32 Gyr for initial cluster formation, and tU=13.79+/-0.34 Gyr for the age of the Universe. This value translates to H0=68.72+3.95-3.49(stat.)+2.65-2.32(sys.) km s-1 Mpc-1, where the systematic error comes from a realistic estimate of the zero point uncertainty on the GC absolute ages derived from stellar models.

Related

  1. The independence of the mid-infrared RR Lyrae Period-Luminosity relation from metallicity from a study of three globular clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud
    Steve Ardern, Vicky Scowcroft, Stijn Wuyts
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  2. Cluster Ages to Reconstruct the Milky Way Assembly (CARMA). V. The chronological merger tree of the Milky Way
    Fernando Aguado-Agelet, Chiara Zerbinati, Davide Massari +9
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  3. Re-evaluating the resolved mass-metallicity relation with a self-consistent metallicity calibration
    Ziming Peng, Renbin Yan, Zesen Lin +1
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0GalaxiesCrossref
  4. From the Milky Way to the Early Universe: How Metallicity Shapes the Formation of Double Neutron Stars
    Abhishek Chattaraj, Jeff J. Andrews, Monica Gallegos-Garcia +9
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  5. The DESIRED strong-line calibrations: I. New empirical metallicity relations for the local and high-redshift universe
    F Fabián Rosales-Ortega, J Eduardo Méndez-Delgado, Jonhatan U Guerrero-González +16
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{zerbinati2026cluster,
  title = {{Cluster Ages to Reconstruct the Milky Way Assembly (CARMA). VI. The age-metallicity relation of in-situ clusters and the age of the Universe}},
  author = {Chiara Zerbinati and Davide Massari and Fernando Aguado-Agelet and Cristiano Fanelli and Massimiliano Matteuzzi and Santi Cassisi and Matteo Monelli and Cristiana Spingola and Carme Gallart and Maurizio Salaris and Roger E. Cohen and Edoardo Ceccarelli and Sara Saracino and Elena Pancino},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.14169},
  eprint = {2610.14169},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14169},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cluster Ages to Reconstruct the Milky Way Assembly (CARMA). VI. The age-metallicity relation of in-situ clusters and the age of the Universe
AU  - Chiara Zerbinati
AU  - Davide Massari
AU  - Fernando Aguado-Agelet
AU  - Cristiano Fanelli
AU  - Massimiliano Matteuzzi
AU  - Santi Cassisi
AU  - Matteo Monelli
AU  - Cristiana Spingola
AU  - Carme Gallart
AU  - Maurizio Salaris
AU  - Roger E. Cohen
AU  - Edoardo Ceccarelli
AU  - Sara Saracino
AU  - Elena Pancino
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.14169
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14169
AB  - Within the homogeneous framework for the derivation of GC ages defined by the CARMA collaboration, we focus on the clusters born in-situ in the MW. As they are the oldest among the old GCs, their absolute age provides constraints about the age of the Universe. Moreover, the shape of their AMR is expected to show the imprints of past merger events, in case these were able to trigger GC formation in the Galaxy. We derive new homogeneous ages for 18 GCs dynamically and/or chemically classified as in-situ, and build the MW AMR from a total sample of 34 GCs. We find that all the selected GCs follow a well defined AMR, with the exception of NGC6642 and Pal1. While the former is likely a member of the LKH merger event, thus putting chronological evidence for the existence of this progenitor on even more robust ground, for the latter we propose an alternative scenario according to which it formed in-situ, but in a metal-depleted region of the Galaxy, possibly due to the interaction with an unspecified merger event. To find evidence of merger-driven GC formation, we use a GMM for the observed age distribution. This is statistically best-fit by 4 components, which we associate with significant events of the MW merger history. Cluster ages were finally calibrated to a more accurate absolute age scale based on asteroseismic measurements of the mass of red giant stars in NGC6791, and the resulting AMR was fit to compute the look-back time for the beginning of cluster formation in the MW. The fit yields t_GC,i=13.59+0.33-0.32 Gyr for initial cluster formation, and tU=13.79+/-0.34 Gyr for the age of the Universe. This value translates to H0=68.72+3.95-3.49(stat.)+2.65-2.32(sys.) km s-1 Mpc-1, where the systematic error comes from a realistic estimate of the zero point uncertainty on the GC absolute ages derived from stellar models.
ER  -