Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Predictive Turbulent Combustion Simulation
Abstract
Predictive simulation of turbulent combustion remains challenging because stiff chemical kinetics, turbulent transport, molecular mixing, and heat release interact nonlinearly across unresolved scales. In the filtered or averaged formulations, reaction rate is unclosed, and the integration of detailed chemistry constitutes the dominant computational cost. Conventional closures such as mixing-limited models, flamelet and manifold methods, conditional moment closure, and transported probability/filtered density function (PDF/FDF) formulations, encode substantial physical insight, but rely on structural assumptions that may lose validity outside their calibrated regimes. Machine learning offers a complementary approach because of its ability to approximate complex nonlinear functions. In turbulent combustion, this capability can be used to relax restrictive closure assumptions, learn unresolved nonlinear mappings from data, and accelerate expensive computations such as detailed chemistry computation. However, purely data-driven models may violate conservation laws and thermochemical consistency. They may also extrapolate poorly outside the training domain and destabilize the CFD solvers in which they are embedded. Physics-guided machine learning (PGML) addresses these failure modes by incorporating prior knowledge throughout the modeling pipeline: in the training data and input features, the model architecture, the loss function, the hybrid closure structure, and the solver-aware validation protocol. This article reviews PGML for turbulence-chemistry interaction (TCI) modeling within this framework.
Related
- A physics-constrained machine-learning sub-grid-scale modeling approach for turbulent premixed flames
- Role of flame localization in wavemaker regions on the suppression of combustion instability in turbulent partially-premixed methane flames
- Passage of particles through matter and the effective straggling-function: High-fidelity accelerated simulation via Physics-Informed Machine Learning
- Machine Learning Accelerated Plasma Simulation through Physics Guided Time Jumps
- Physics-Informed Latent Neural ODEs for Reduced-Order Modeling of Hydrogen, Ammonia, and Methane Combustion Kinetics
BibTeX
@misc{bansude2026physicsguided,
title = {{Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Predictive Turbulent Combustion Simulation}},
author = {Shubhangi Bansude and Jay Patel},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.29033},
eprint = {2608.29033},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29033},
note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Predictive Turbulent Combustion Simulation
AU - Shubhangi Bansude
AU - Jay Patel
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/29
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.29033
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29033
AB - Predictive simulation of turbulent combustion remains challenging because stiff chemical kinetics, turbulent transport, molecular mixing, and heat release interact nonlinearly across unresolved scales. In the filtered or averaged formulations, reaction rate is unclosed, and the integration of detailed chemistry constitutes the dominant computational cost. Conventional closures such as mixing-limited models, flamelet and manifold methods, conditional moment closure, and transported probability/filtered density function (PDF/FDF) formulations, encode substantial physical insight, but rely on structural assumptions that may lose validity outside their calibrated regimes. Machine learning offers a complementary approach because of its ability to approximate complex nonlinear functions. In turbulent combustion, this capability can be used to relax restrictive closure assumptions, learn unresolved nonlinear mappings from data, and accelerate expensive computations such as detailed chemistry computation. However, purely data-driven models may violate conservation laws and thermochemical consistency. They may also extrapolate poorly outside the training domain and destabilize the CFD solvers in which they are embedded. Physics-guided machine learning (PGML) addresses these failure modes by incorporating prior knowledge throughout the modeling pipeline: in the training data and input features, the model architecture, the loss function, the hybrid closure structure, and the solver-aware validation protocol. This article reviews PGML for turbulence-chemistry interaction (TCI) modeling within this framework.
ER -